Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Talbert v. Talbert, 7 So. 2d 173.
-
Succession of Erbelding
509 So. 2d 568
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
(1942); Succession of Andrus, 131 La.
-
Mahmud v. Mahmud
444 So. 2d 774
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Talbert v. Talbert, 1942, , ; Lane v. Lane, La.App.
- Miller v. Miller 405 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
-
Ware v. Ware
365 So. 2d 842
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Talbert v. Talbert, 1942, , ; Lane v. Lane, La.App.
-
Lane v. Lane
375 So. 2d 660
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
4613 allows an attorney's fee to plaintiff in an uncontested partition, that provision is not applicable to a contested partition like this; , (1942); and in any event C.C.P.
- Lacaze v. Tennessee Life Ins. Co. 346 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
-
Hurta v. Melcher
260 So. 2d 324
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
(1942), also cited by appellee, we observe that we find no reference to the “tract of land” as revenue-producing, and in any case we are bound to follow the later supreme court expression in Ratcliff.
-
Malone v. Malone
257 So. 2d 397
La. 1972
1061 , 58 So.2d *767 385 (1952); , (1942); Vicknair v. Terracina, 168 La.
-
Price v. Price
229 So. 2d 116
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
When the wife fails in her suit for separation, the community is intact, the husband is responsible for her lawyer’s fees as a community obligation ( , (1942)) and she cannot obtain a judgment against him, except as specifically provided by statute.
-
Herman v. Jambois
205 So. 2d 63
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
1061 , ; , ; Gosserand v. Monteleone, 164 La.
-
Pennison v. Pennison
187 So. 2d 747
La. 1966
Uchello v. Uchello, 220 La.
-
Sciambra v. Sciambra
153 So. 2d 441
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
The husband contends that the fees of his attorneys are a community debt, citing: , ; Uchello v. Uchello, 220 La.
-
Abunza v. Olivier
88 So. 2d 815
La. 1956
quets and gains, the husband is not entitled to have credit for separate funds contributed by him to the community, except to the extent that the property of the community is thereby enhanced in value at the time of its dissolution; and this must be shown with reasonable certainty.” In support of his position that a credit should be allowed defendant, , , where it was held that a husband who had 250 head of cattle at the date of his marriage was entitled to take as his separate property, at the
-
Tanner v. Tanner
86 So. 2d 80
La. 1956
Uchello v. Uchello, 220 La.
- Succession of Guichard 64 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
- Uchello v. Uchello 58 So. 2d 385 La. 1952
- Uchello v. Uchello 58 So. 2d 385 La. 1952
- August v. Blache 9 So. 2d 402 La. 1942