DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Coyle v. North American Oil Consolidated, 9 So. 2d 473.

21 citing documents.

  • Edmundson Bros. Partnership v. Montex Drilling Co. 672 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    173 , (1947); , (1942); (La.App.
  • Frey v. Amoco Production Co. 603 So. 2d 166 La. 1992
    559 , (1943); , (1942); Caddo Oil & Mining Co. v. Producers' Oil Co., 134 La.
  • Alvord v. Sun Oil Co. 251 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    Melancon v. Texas Co., supra; , (1942); Tyson v. Surf Oil Co., 195 La.
  • Bouterie v. Kleinpeter 247 So. 2d 548 La. 1971
    Melancon v. Texas Co., supra; , (1942) ; Tyson v. Surf Oil Co, 195 La.
  • Breaux v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation 163 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    529 , ; , ; 2 Summers, Oil and Gas, § 399, pp. 568 et seq.; Brown, The Law of Oil and Gas Leases, § 16.02, pp. 272 et seq., and § 16.03, p. 322; Merrill, Implied Covenants in Oil & Gas Leases (2nd Ed. 1940) 255.
  • Greene v. Carter Oil Company 152 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1963
    And `When the intent of the parties is doubtful, the construction put upon it, by the manner in which it has been executed by both, or by one with the express or implied assent of the other furnishes a rule for its interpretation.'" It was observed in Coyle, et al. v. North American Oil Consolidated, et al., , , (1942) that: "The rule is well established that mineral leases must be construed as leases, and that the codal provisions applicable to ordinary leases must be applied."
  • Pierce v. Atlantic Refining Company 140 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    Tyson v. Surf Oil Co., 195 La.
  • Davis v. Laster 138 So. 2d 558 La. 1962
    Tyson v. Surf Oil Co., 195 La.
  • Prestridge v. Humble Oil & Refining Company 131 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    558 ] , , rejected the contention and reiterated that Act 205 of 1938 is `remedial and procedural in character, and that it has not affected or changed any of the substantive rights flowing from the execution of mineral leases.'
  • Bailey v. Meadows 130 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    Tyson v. Surf Oil Co., 195 La.
  • Davis v. Laster 130 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Milling v. Collector of Revenue, supra; , ; Tyson v. Surf Oil Co., 195 La.
  • Breaux v. Magnolia Petroleum Co. 121 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    529 , ; , ; McCoy v. Arkansas Natural Gas Co., 184 La.
  • Sohio Petroleum Co. v. Millers 112 So. 2d 695 La. 1959
    there were two wells on a 120 acre tract producing from a deep sand.
  • Sohio Petroleum Company v. Miller 112 So. 2d 695 La. 1959
    there were two wells on a 120 acre tract producing from a deep sand.
  • Reagan v. Murphy 105 So. 2d 210 La. 1958
    But the Court, citing the rulings in the Allison, , , rejected the contention and reiterated that Act 205 of 1938 is “remedial and procedural in character, and that it has not affected or changed any of the substantive rights flowing from the execution of mineral leases.” Immediately after the Arnold case became final, the oil fraternity sought to obtain
  • Melancon v. Texas Company 89 So. 2d 135 La. 1956
    The rule is equally well established that in construing mineral leases, “ * * * the codal provisions applicable to ordinary leases must be applied.” , ; Tyson v. Surf Oil Co., 195 La.
  • Milling v. Collector of Revenue 57 So. 2d 679 La. 1952
    846 ; the duration and conditions of such leases were held to come within the rule announced in Article 2684, Coyle v. North American Oil Consolidated, On Rehearing, *780 ; and the lessor was required to fulfill the obligations enumerated in Article 2692.
  • Milling v. Collector of Revenue 57 So. 2d 679 La. 1952
    846 ; the duration and conditions of such leases were held to come within the rule announced in Article 2684, Coyle v. North American Oil Consolidated, On Rehearing, , ; and the lessor was required to fulfill the obligations enumerated in Article 2692.
  • Texas Co. v. State Mineral Board 44 So. 2d 841 La. 1949
  • Arnold v. Sun Oil Co. 48 So. 2d 369 La. 1949
  • Gennuso v. Magnolia Petroleum Co. 14 So. 2d 445 La. 1943