DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ortego v. Nehi Bottling Works, 6 So. 2d 677.

21 citing documents.

  • Dooley v. Wright 501 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    NOTES [1] After trial on the merits, judgment against the individual stockholders in Ortego was affirmed by the supreme court at , (1942).
  • Robertson v. Gulf South Beverage, Inc. 421 So. 2d 877 La. 1982
    Centineo v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., (La.
  • Centineo v. ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INCORPORATED 276 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
    [2] , (1942); and cases cited therein.
  • Wiley v. J. Weingarten, Inc. 205 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    (1942); LaFleur v. Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Lake Charles, Inc., (La.
  • LaFleur v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Lake Charles 195 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    Naquin v. Baton Rouge Coca-Cola Bottling Co., La.App.
  • Naquin v. Baton Rouge Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 182 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
  • Bonura v. Barq's Beverages of Baton Rouge 135 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    The law applicable to cases of this kind as enunciated by this Court in the Auzenne v. Gulf Public Service Company cases and Lanza v. DeRidder Coca Cola Bottling Company case, both supra, , , and we quote therefrom: "This court has never had under consideration a case involving injury resulting from the explosion of bottled carbonated beverages, but our attention has been called to the fact that the Court of Appeal for the First Circuit has had occasion to pass upon similar questions i
  • Steadman v. American Fidelity & Casualty Company 113 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
    Ross v. Tynes, La.App., ; , ; Nuss v. MacKenzie, La.App., ; Gulf Ins.
  • Saunders v. Walker 86 So. 2d 89 La. 1956
    512 ; Lanza v. De Ridder Coca Cola Bottling Co., La.App., ; Meyers v. Alexandria Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Ltd., La.App., ; , ; Hake v. Air Reduction Sales Company, supra.” In the instant case the plaintiff freed himself from negligence, and the trial judge held: “Suffice it to say here that plaintiff’s claim of freedom from fault on his part and on the part of members of his household appears to be sustained by the evidence.
  • Northwestern Mutual Fire Association v. Allain 77 So. 2d 395 La. 1954
    447 ; , ; Gerald v. Standard Oil Co., 204 La.
  • Redmond v. Ouachita Coca-Cola Bottling Company 76 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
    We think any dispute on this point was conclusively settled by the pronouncement and application of the rule as elucidated in the able and exhaustive development of the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Fournet in the case of Ortego v. Nehi Bottling Company, Inc., , .
  • Johnson v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 63 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    In Ortego v. Nehi Bottling Works, 1942, , , Chief Justice Fournet, as the organ of the court, thoroughly analyzed much of the jurisprudence and the facts upon which the decisions of the courts were predicated, relating to the application of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur to bottle explosion cases and we are of the opinion that we are thereby
  • Mayerhefer v. LOUISIANA COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. LTD. 52 So. 2d 866 La. 1951
    Since the instant matter involves a foreign ingredient damage claim, , ; Lanza v. DeRidder Coca-Cola Bottling Co., La.App., ; Hake v. Air Reduction Sales *327 Co., 210 La.
  • Monroe v. HG Hill Stores 51 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    our Supreme Court discussed several cases and referred to Payne v. Rome Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 10 Ga.App.
  • Boucher v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 46 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
  • Piacun v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 33 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    in which the Supreme Court approved what had been said in the Lanza case.
  • Hake v. Air Reduction Sales Co. 28 So. 2d 441 La. 1946
    512 ; Lanz v. DeRidder Coca Cola Bottling Co., La.App., ; Meyers v. Alexandria Coca Cola Bottling Co., Ltd., La.App., ; , .
  • Duplantier v. City of Baton Rouge 23 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
  • Watkins v. Gulf Refining Co. 20 So. 2d 273 La. 1944
    Ross v. Tynes, La.App., ; , ; Nuss v. MacKenzie, La.
  • White v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 16 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
    it seems to us, renders conclusive defendant's negligence in the present case.
  • Meyers v. Alexandria Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 8 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
    The Supreme Court recently has had under consideration a case, , , almost identical in facts to the present case.