DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Alfortish v. Wagner, 7 So. 2d 708.

19 citing documents.

  • Fouad Hijazi and Rimi Elsabeh Hijazi v. Anne Schaefer Dentler La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • Hijazi v. Dentler 125 So. 3d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Alfortish, v. Wagner, , (1942).
  • Oak Harbor Property Owners' v. Millennium 934 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    1988); , (1942); (La.App.
  • Hammons v. PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE, ETC. 461 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • Cabibi v. Jones 391 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
  • Gwatney v. Miller 371 So. 2d 1355 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    659 , ; , ; Edwards v. Wiseman, 198 La.
  • Lamana-Panno-Fallo, Inc. v. Heebe 352 So. 2d 1303 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
    At the same time, , (1942) wherein a general plan of development was found and which stated as a general proposition that adoption by the governmental authority of an ordinance zoning a particular area to commercial uses would not nullify the general plan of development.
  • Hargroder v. City of Eunice 341 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    893 , (1968); , (1942); writ refused ; A. Yiannopoulous, Civil Law Property Section 104; LSA-C.C.
  • East Parker Properties, Inc. v. Pelican Realty Co. 335 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
  • Fitzwater v. Walker 281 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
  • Gerde v. Simonson Investments, Inc. 197 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
    659 , ; , ; Edwards v. Wiseman, 198 La.
  • Olivier v. Berggren 136 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    The other reason is, , , where this very question was at issue, the Supreme Court held that the City of New Orleans could not change, by use of the zoning law, the title restriction for use of lots developed by a uniform plan for residential purposes exclusively, and cited 26 C.J.S.
  • In Re Congregation of St. Rita Roman Cath. Church 130 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
    659 ; ; , ; Edwards v. Wiseman, 198 La.
  • Lillard v. Jet Homes, Inc. 129 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
  • Herzberg v. Harrison 102 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    659 , ; , ; Edwards v. Wiseman, 198, La.
  • Murphy v. Marino 60 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
  • Munson v. Berdon 51 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    659 , , , , and as the latter case is relied upon by both counsel but particularly by counsel for plaintiff, we will quote from that case as follows: "Before considering the various contentions raised by the defendant, it is apt to observe that the jurisprudence of this State is well settled that stipulations
  • Holloway v. Ransome 43 So. 2d 673 La. 1949
    711: “* * * the jurisprudence of this State is well settled that stipulations in title deeds providing for building restrictions (such as the one contained in the defendant’s title) are valid and enforcible where the restrictions have been inserted in pursuance of a general plan devised by the ancestor
  • Plauche v. Albert 42 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    With regard to the other point raised, that is that the property adjoining the restricted area has become commercialized within the last few years, and the purposes of the restrictions have become frustrated, , and it was there decided adversely to the contention now being made on behalf of the defendant.