Reiners v. St. Ceran
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., November 12, 1971 254 So. 2d 505; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., July 15, 1970 239 So. 2d 491; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., December 1, 1969 228 So. 2d 745; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., January 26, 1953 63 So. 2d 465; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., January 31, 1930 125 So. 756
Reiners v. St. Ceran, 27 La. 112 (1875).
Opinion text
On Motion to Dismiss. Howe. J. The plaintiff moves to dismiss the appeal of S. D. Maxwell, on the grounds first — that it is frivolous, and second — that the appeal bond is not given for a sufficient amount. The first reason is not a good one for dismissing the appeal, though it may be for giving heavy damages when the case shall be tried on its merits. The second reason is not sustained by the record. So far as we can gather from any thing in the record the amount of the bond is sufficient. Motion overruled.