DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Davies v. Consolidated Underwriters, 6 So. 2d 351.

22 citing documents.

  • Joyce Gorman v. City of Opelousas 148 So. 3d 888 La. 2014
    189 , (1950) (plurality opinion), which involved an occurrence policy, 10 this court recognized that the Direct Action Statute “expresses the public policy of this State that an insurance policy against liability is not issued primarily for the protection of the insured but for the protection of the public.” Id., 46 So.2d at 129-30 , , (1942) (emphasis omitted).
  • Grefer v. Travelers Insurance Company 919 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    § 22:655; Adams v. Thomas, 98-2003, 98-2005 (La.4/13/99), ; *774 Davis[Davies] v. Consolidated Underwriters, , , (La.
  • Murray v. City of Bunkie 686 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    189 , (1950); , (1942); and Edwards v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, 11 La.App.
  • Williams v. Lemaire 655 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    46 So.2d at 129, 130 , , (1942).
  • Guillory v. Gulf South Beverages, Inc. 506 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
    (1942) for the proposition that a liability insurance policy is not issued primarily for the benefit of the insured but for the protection of the public, Enterprise states that such public benefit is a major consideration in the consummation of the insurance contract; accordingly, Enterprise argues, the
  • State v. Martin 487 So. 2d 1295 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    333 , (1951); , (1942); Laurent v. Unity Industrial Life Ins.
  • Baesler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 469 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Nevels v. Hendricks, ibid
  • Chennault v. Dupree 398 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    The Supreme Court held as follows: "If there should be any doubt as to the effect of Act 55 of 1930, it should for all times be put at rest by the opinion written by Mr. Justice Rogers in the case of Davies v. Consolidated Underwriters, 1942, , , which was not concerned with delayed notice of an accidental occurrence, but where the Court set out the general objects, purposes and effect of Act 55 of 1930 as to third persons, not parties to the policy contract, 199 La.
  • Nevels v. Hendrix 367 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    (1942); Webb v. Zurich Ins.
  • Holtzclaw v. Falco, Inc. 355 So. 2d 1279 La. 1978
    (1942); West v. Monroe Bakery, 217 La.
  • Domingue v. Continental Ins. Co. 348 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
  • Miller v. Marcantel 221 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
  • Johnson v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company 218 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1969
    See, , ; West v. Monroe Bakery, Inc., 217 La.
  • Webb v. Zurich Insurance Company 205 So. 2d 398 La. 1967
    See, , ; West v. Monroe Bakery, Inc., 217 La.
  • Musmeci v. American Automobile Insurance Company 146 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    Continental Casualty Co. v. Quebedeaux, 5 Cir., 234 F.2d 241 ; West v. Monroe Bakery, 217 La.
  • Futch v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York 136 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    v. Consolidated *729 Underwriters, , , 357: "Plaintiffs sued Mabry's insurance carrier directly as they had a right to do under the provisions of Act No. 55 of 1930.
  • Hurdle v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 135 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    v. Consolidated Underwriters, La.App., (2d Cir. 1940); , (1942); Boudreaux et al. v. Cagle Motors et al., La.App., (1st Cir. 1954); Talbot v. Allstate Insurance Company, La.
  • West v. Monroe Bakery, Inc. 46 So. 2d 122 La. 1950
    d party or his heirs have no copy of the contract of insurance and may not even know for many weeks that such a policy was in existence, much less what its [its] terms and conditions require.” If there should be any doubt as to the effect of Act 55 of 1930, it should for all times be put at rest by the opinion written by Mr. Justice Rogers in the case of Davies v. Consolidated Underwriters, 1942, , , which was not concerned with delayed notice of an accidental occurrence, but where the Court set
  • Jackson v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. 23 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
    In their oral argument, original brief, and again in their supplemental brief, , , contending that the Supreme Court had expressed itself relative to Act 55 of 1930 and had held that the said Act *Page 770 expresses the public policy of this State, that an insurance policy against liability is not issued primarily for the protection of the insured but for the protection of the public
  • Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. Alwes 16 So. 2d 217 La. 1943
  • Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. Alwes 16 So. 2d 217 La. 1943
  • Davies v. Consolidated Underwriters 14 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1943
    of the State of Louisiana; on January 5, 1942, The Supreme Court rendered judgment annulling the judgments of this court and the District Court, and remanding the case to the District Court "for the purpose of permitting plaintiffs to amend their petition in line with the allegations of their motion to remand and for further proceedings consistent with the views herein expressed" (emphasis ours) , , 357; on February 18, 1942, amended petition was filed in this suit by Egbert E. Davies and Sue Sh