Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In Re Gray's Succession, 9 So. 2d 481.

19 citing documents.

Humphries v. LA. DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS, DIV. OF TRANSP. 545 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Tenneco Oil Co. v. Hines 535 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
In making his finding the trial judge relied heavily on In re Gray’s Succession, , and Boykin v. Jenkins, 174 La.
Succession of Rodgers 499 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
270 (1932); , So.2d 481 (1982); (La.App.
Cormier v. Cormier 479 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Juneau v. Alexander 446 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Although the Supreme Court of this State has indicated' that a presumption of marriage and legitimacy may arise in certain cases; In Re Gray’s Succession, , (1942); Succession of Anderson, 176 La.
Succession of Matte 346 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Perhaps the most liberal application of the presumption of legitimacy is found in the case of , (1942).
Succession of Fuselier 325 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
(1942); Succession of Kneipp, 172 La.
Succession of Leduc 153 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
In re Gray’s Succession, , ; and Succession of Curtis, 161 La.
Succession of Israel 146 So. 2d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
198 ; In re Gray’s Succession, , ; Succession of Gaines, 227 La.
Matthews v. Carter 138 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
In support of defendant's contention, the Succession of Gray, [ ] , is cited as a leading case in point.
Succession of Lapene 96 So. 2d 321 La. 1957
The undertaker’s record was made and the newspaper article was written and published at a time unsuspicious, and we think they were admissible, if for no other purpose, as corroborative of other evidence, both oral and documentary, adduced on the trial of the case.” See, also, in re Gray’s Succession, , .
Goins v. Gates 93 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Wigmore, is found "in the probability that the `natural effusions' (to use Lord Eldon's often-quoted phrase) of those who talk over family affairs when no special reason for bias or passion exists are fairly trustworthy, and should be given weight by judges and juries, as they are in the ordinary affairs of life."' "The Court again in the [In re] , , the Court stated: "`In proceeding to have plaintiffs recognized as irregular heirs of the parties' ancestor, and placed in possession of his estate
Succession of Rockwood 91 So. 2d 779 La. 1956
832 ; In re Gray’s Succession, , ; *529 Cameron v. Rowland, 208 La.
Succession of White 85 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1956
Dazio v. Wainwright 81 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
198 , in Re Gray’s Succession [ ], , Hubback’s Evidence of Succession (1844), page 652, Aalholm v. People, 211 N.Y.
Succession of Gaines 79 So. 2d 322 La. 1955
595 ; [In re] Gray’s Succession, , .
Patin v. T. L. James Co. 42 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
595 ; Gray's Succession, , .'
Cameron v. Rowland 23 So. 2d 283 La. 1945
595 ; Gray’s Succession, , .
Cameron v. Rowland. 23 So. 2d 285 La. 1945
595 ; Gray’s Succession, , .