Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Fogle v. Feazel, 10 So. 2d 695.

15 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana, Ex R El. Justin Dale Tureau Vs. La. 2022
Kaylonna Dotson v. Darren Balsamo and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
Anne Lowenburg, Judith Lowenburg, Wife of and Tom Lowenburg, Sarah Lowman, Jack Stolier, William B. Taylor, III, M.D. … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Appellant further argues that except for the 20 The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Wainwright v. Fontenot, explained: The term “damages” refers to “pecuniary compensation, recompense, or satisfaction for an injury sustained.” So.2d 695, 698 (1942).
Benjamin Perry v. Starr Imdemnity & Liability Company, Humberto Mata and Yellowjacket Oilfield Services, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
Duet v. Landry 250 So. 3d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 5 Cir. 11/13/12), , 843, quoting Fogle v. Feazel , , 909, , 698 (1942).
Fie, LLC v. New Jax Condo Ass'n, Inc. 241 So. 3d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
10/17/00), , 74, quoting Fogle v. Feazel , , 910, , 698 (1942).
Mukesh R. Zaveri, Et Ux. v. Dennis Lloyd Husers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
10/17/00), as follows: The term “damages” refers to “pecuniary compensation, recompense, or satisfaction for an injury sustained.” So.2d 695, 698 (1942).
Zaveri v. Husers 224 So. 3d 389 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
10/17/00), , as follows: The term “damages” refers to “pecuniary compensation, recompense, or satisfaction for an injury sustained.” , (1942).
Jones v. Capitol Enterprises, Inc. 89 So. 3d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
art. 2315 the term “damages” has been construed to mean “‘pecuniary compensation, recompense, or satisfaction for injury sustained.’ ” Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), ( , (1942)).
McGee v. AC AND S, INC. 933 So. 2d 770 La. 2006
Harold Alex, Jr. v. Rayne Concrete Service La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
10/17/00), 74, the supreme court explained the difference between general and special damages: The term “damages” refers to “pecuniary compensation, recompense, or satisfaction for an injury sustained.” So.2d 695, 698 (1942).
Alex v. Rayne Concrete Service 915 So. 2d 931 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Wainwright v. Fontenot 774 So. 2d 70 La. 2000
LeBlanc v. Mercedes-Benz of North America 633 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Jones v. Whittington 171 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
Counsel for defendant argue that the Fite cases are no longer reliable authority, and, in support of this argument, they cite, inter alia, , ; Godfrey v. Lowery, 223 La.