DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite August v. Blache, 9 So. 2d 402.

20 citing documents.

  • Lemoine v. Lemoine 715 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • Veron v. Veron 624 So. 2d 1295 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • Trahan v. Trahan 340 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
    Appellant filed a , (1942)
  • Gauthreaux v. Gauthreaux 315 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
  • Wilson v. Wilson 317 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
  • Mendoza v. Mendoza 310 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    The Fulmer court stated: " , (1942), previously cited."
  • Webster v. Webster 308 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    (1942), defendant wife's separation decree conclusively establishes her freedom from fault until the date of said judgment.
  • Nethken v. Nethken 307 So. 2d 563 La. 1975
  • Fontaine v. Fitzpatrick 303 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    In view of the exhaustive discussion of the prior jurisprudence and statutory law therein we see no necessity to discuss the matter, , (1942).
  • Frederic v. Frederic 302 So. 2d 903 La. 1974
  • Fulmer v. Fulmer 301 So. 2d 622 La. 1974
    -5- , (1942), previously cited.
  • Frederic v. Frederic 295 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    We therefore hold that, while Mr. Frederic could have offered proof on the issue of the wife's freedom from fault, the default judgment of separation [which carries the "implication" of her freedom from fault, , (1942)] constitutes a prima facie showing of her freedom from fault and is sufficient, in the absence of contradictory evidence, to entitle her to Article 160 alimony.
  • Ballard v. Ballard 283 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
    817 (1941); , (1942); McKnight v. Irving, 228 La.
  • Rayborn v. Rayborn 246 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
  • Smith v. Smith 216 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
    A history of these statutes, and of the prior amendments to Article 160, -1036 , 404 (1942).
  • Gamino v. Gamino 199 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
    *205 , (1942) the Supreme Court of Louisiana, with Chief Justice O'Niell as the Organ of the Court, stated the following: "We have given a history of these statutes in order to demonstrate that the provision in Article 160 of the Civil Code, that the wife must show that she `has not been at fault', in order to
  • Jones v. Floyd 154 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    See also: , ; Stallings v. Stallings, 179 La.
  • Sachse v. Sachse 150 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    In this regard the principle that where the wife has obtained the divorce (except where *776 fault is not at issue), , , from which we hereinafter quote at some length.
  • Tanner v. Tanner 86 So. 2d 80 La. 1956
    Gastauer v. Gastauer, supra; Alpha v. Aucoin, supra; and Benedict v. Holmes, supra.
  • Courtin v. Lenz 42 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    406, the Supreme Court said: "* * * our opinion is that any claim that Mrs. Blache may have had against Mr. Blache for the * * * recovery of the fees incurred in the suit for a separation from bed and board, must be considered as having been abandoned by the failure of Mrs. Blache to claim reimbursemen