DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Martin v. Markley, 11 So. 2d 593.

21 citing documents.

  • Anders v. Andrus 773 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    997 (1958), reversed on other grounds, , 202 La.
  • Blades v. Olivier 740 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • Taylor v. Town of Arcadia 519 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • Munson v. Gaylord Broadcasting Co. 491 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    that [an utterance defamatory per se] was uttered with malice ...," , (1942).
  • Elmer v. Coplin 485 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • Clements v. Ryan 382 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
    (1942); Edwards v. Derrick, 193 La.
  • Trahan v. Ritterman 368 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
  • Shylock, Inc. v. Covenant Broad. Corp. of La. 352 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    (1942), as follows: "In order to determine the soundness of this proposition, it becomes necessary to decide whether the matter contained in defendant's letter is libelous per se, or whether it is merely libelous per quod.
  • Carter v. Catfish Cabin 316 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
  • Russo v. Kelly 228 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    (1942); Edwards v. Derrick, 193 La.
  • Parsons v. Gulf & South American Steamship Co. 194 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
    (1942); Edwards v. Derrick, 193 La.
  • Walker v. Associated Press 191 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
  • Dyer v. Davis 189 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    347 , ; , , and Deshotel v. Thistlethwaite, 240 La.
  • Lazar v. Gremillion 189 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
  • State v. Garrison 154 So. 2d 400 La. 1963
    7E, 510, this court has pointed out in subsequent decisions that the Nicholson case is only authority for the proposition that Louisiana recognizes the doctrine of qualified privilege respecting fair comment and criticism of public officers and men in public life, but that 'the privilege does not extend to the publication of false statements of fact concerning public officers.’ , ; Kennedy v. Item Co., 213 La.
  • Miller, Smith and Champagne v. Capital City Press 142 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    the Supreme Court of Louisiana, in commenting upon the doctrine of qualified privilege stated: "The next contention of the defendant is that the statements and comments made by her in her letter are privileged communications and that, consequently, the judge was in error in finding that she was respon
  • Giordano v. Tullier 139 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
  • Deshotel v. Thistlethwaite 121 So. 2d 222 La. 1960
  • Madison v. Bolton 102 So. 2d 433 La. 1958
    1 , ; , 11 So.2d *1013 593; Kennedy v. Item Co., 213 La.
  • Kennedy v. Item Co. 34 So. 2d 886 La. 1948
  • Robin v. Walsh 17 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944