DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hodges v. Norton, 8 So. 2d 618.

17 citing documents.

  • St. Mary Operating Co. v. Guidry 954 So. 2d 397 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    E.g., Hodges v. Norton, supra, , (1942); Bodcaw Lumber Co. of La.
  • St. Mary Operating Co. v. Champagne 945 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    It is established by Hodges v. Norton, [ ] supra, and Bodcaw Lumber Co. of La.
  • St. Mary Operating Company v. Lester Joseph Champagne La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    It is established by Hodges v. Norton, [] supra, and Bodcaw Lumber Co. of La.
  • Davis Oil v. Steamboat Petroleum 583 So. 2d 1139 La. 1991
    31:174 (and Official Comment thereto); , (1942).
  • Horton v. Mobley 578 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    (1942); see now Mineral Code Art. 69.
  • Allied Chemical Corp. v. Dye 441 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    (1942), Lowry v. MRT Exploration Co., supra .
  • Cox v. Sanders 421 So. 2d 869 La. 1982
    *873 , pointed out that where the landowners established a servitude on one continuous tract that there was but one indivisible servitude and where drilling operations were conducted under a lease covering only an undivided mineral interest, that constituted sufficient use of the servitude to interrup
  • Cox v. Sanders 409 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    In argument to this court, , (1942) (La.App.
  • Lowry v. MRT Exploration Co. 382 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
    (1942), two co-owners conveyed property by a deed which reserved to them a one-half interest in the oil, gas, and other minerals.
  • Gunby v. Commercial Solvents Corporation 170 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
    144 , (1960); , (1942); Ohio Oil Company v. Ferguson, 213 La.
  • Leiter Minerals, Inc. v. California Co. 132 So. 2d 845 La. 1961
    An example of a servitude established for a certain time (a servitude of specific duration) , .
  • Leiter Minerals, Inc. v. California Co. 126 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1961
    our Supreme Court recognized the right to limit the duration of a mineral servitude by contract, and sharply differentiated between the contractual limitation and the statutory prescription of ten years for non-user, in the following language: “Thus, in the instatnt case, when A. J. Hodges released in
  • Gulf Oil Corporation v. Clement 118 So. 2d 361 La. 1960
    902 ; , , and Lenard v. Shell Oil Co., Inc., 211 La.
  • Childs v. Washington 87 So. 2d 111 La. 1956
  • Elson v. Mathewes 69 So. 2d 734 La. 1953
    919 , ; , ; Lenard v. Shell Oil Co., 211 La.
  • Ohio Oil Co. v. Ferguson 34 So. 2d 746 La. 1946
  • Byrd v. Forgotson 34 So. 2d 777 La. 1945