Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Forney, 24 La. Ann. 191.

4 citing documents.

State v. Brinkley 157 So. 388 La. 1934
it was held that an indictment charging the accused with shooting with intent to kill and murder, while “lying in wait,” was good, as the offense is statutory.
State v. Howerton 138 So. 668 La. 1931
That the attempt to rob is only an aggravation of the • shooting with intent to murder, which makes the crime a capital one;' and that it does not have to be charged with any more particularity .than “lying in wait,” .
State v. Menard 90 So. 665 La. 1922
Ann. 347 ; ; State v. Francis, 36 La.
State v. Spears 64 So. 385 La. 1914
where defendant was found guilty with shooting with intent to kill and murder while lying in wait, and the point was made by defendant that there was a separation of the jury, which in a capital case vitiated the verdict, we say: “Nor do we think there was such a separation of the jury in this case as would vitiate