Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ricks v. Department of State Civil Service, 8 So. 2d 49.

48 citing documents.

Louisiana Federation of Teachers v. State 118 So. 3d 1033 La. 2013
1 Cir. 6/23/00), , , (1942).
France v. EAST CENT. BOSSIER FIRE PROTECT. 4 So. 3d 959 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
France v. East Central Bossier Fire Protection District No. 1 4 So. 3d 959 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Ricks v. Dep’t of State Civil Serv., , (1942).
Louisiana Municipal Ass'n v. State ex rel. Foster 762 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
See Ricks v. Dep’t of State Civil Service, , (1942).
Penn v. State Ex Rel. Foster 751 So. 2d 823 La. 1999
Doherty v. Calcasieu Parish School Bd. 634 So. 2d 1172 La. 1994
Jones v. Board of Ethics for Elected Off. 605 So. 2d 1064 La. 1992
State v. Free 321 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Orleans Parish School Board v. Williams 312 So. 2d 647 La. 1975
1019 , (1958); , (1942); State v. Cusimano, 187 La.
Louisiana Independent Auto Dealers Ass'n v. State 295 So. 2d 796 La. 1974
(1942), the court noted: "* * * whatever is germane and incidental to the purpose may be set out in the title, but if the body of the act embraces cognate matter not strictly within the text of the title, such matter will, nevertheless, be covered by the title."
Bates v. Edwards 294 So. 2d 532 La. 1974
2d 229 (1970); , (1942); State v. Cusimano, 187 La.
State Ex Rel. Guste v. Board of Highways 275 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
* * *" ( 15 So.2d at 9 ) Similarly, , (1942), made the following statement pertaining to the scope of Article VII, Section 56: "We do not construe Section 56 of Article VII of the Constitution to be exclusive in its nature or a limitation on the Legislature.
State v. Sliger 261 So. 2d 643 La. 1972
The principle on which defendants rely for their claim of statutory unconstitutionality is set forth in Section 16 of Article III of the State Constitution which provides that “Every statute enacted by the Legislature shall embrace but one object, and shall have a title indicative of its obj ect.” , (1942), the Court reviewed the cases dealing with this constitutional provision and pointed out that its purpose is not to require the title of an act to be an index of its contents but that it is su
Bonnette v. Karst 261 So. 2d 589 La. 1972
Constant v. State 255 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
722 ; , ; Conley v. City of Shreveport, 216 La.
Parish of Jefferson v. Louisiana Department of Corrections 254 So. 2d 582 La. 1971
[6] Section 16 , (1942).
Bonnette v. Karst 261 So. 2d 589 La. 1971
Crain v. Washington Parish Democratic Executive Committee 252 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Company v. Goslin 246 So. 2d 852 La. 1971
453 ; , ; and City of Lake Charles v. Wallace, 247 La.
Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Co. v. Goslin 246 So. 2d 852 La. 1971
453 ; , ; and City of Lake Charles v. Wallace, 247 La.
Branton v. Parker 233 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Terral 206 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
See e. g., , (1942); Mulhaupt v. City of Shreveport, 126 La.
State v. Guidry 173 So. 2d 192 La. 1965
State v. Guidry 173 So. 2d 192 La. 1965
In re Investigation of Alleged Discrimination Against Bienvenu 158 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Fallon v. New Orleans Police Department 115 So. 2d 844 La. 1959
Cobb v. Louisiana Board of Institutions 111 So. 2d 126 La. 1959
722 ; , ; Conley v. City of Shreveport, 216 La.
State v. Rue 107 So. 2d 702 La. 1958
949 , ; , ; cf., McCauley v. Albert E. Briede & Son, 231 La.
STATE EX REL. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS v. Bergeron 106 So. 2d 295 La. 1958
76 , ; , ; and Richardson & Bass v. Board of Levee Commissioners, 231 La.
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. MacAluso 106 So. 2d 455 La. 1958
1078 , ; , ; State er rel.
Richardson & Bass v. Board of Levee Commissioners 91 So. 2d 353 La. 1956
■ , , this.cojyt *317 pointed out that it was not the purpose of this constitutional provision to require that the title be an index to the contents of the act, or that every end and means convenient or necessary for the accomplishment of the general object of the act be set out at length in the title, but it
State v. Verret 87 So. 2d 297 La. 1956
76 , ; , , and Womach v. Varnado, 204 La.
Gilmore v. State 79 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Hanson v. International Union of Operating Eng. 79 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Domas v. Division of Employment Security of Department of Labor 79 So. 2d 857 La. 1955
And, , , ‘The privilege of holding public office is not guaranteed by the Constitution as an inalienable right.
Konen v. New Orleans Police Department 77 So. 2d 24 La. 1954
And, , , “The privilege of holding public office is not guaranteed by the Constitution as an inalienable right.
Succession of GAMBINO 73 So. 2d 800 La. 1954
Olivedell Planting Co. v. Town of Lake Providence 47 So. 2d 23 La. 1950
Gulf Shipside Storage Corporation v. Thames 46 So. 2d 62 La. 1950
City of New Orleans v. Board of Supervisors 43 So. 2d 237 La. 1949
State Ex Rel. Kemp v. City of Baton Rouge 40 So. 2d 477 La. 1949
Kennedy v. Item Co. 34 So. 2d 886 La. 1948
Whitney Nat. Bank v. Little Creek Oil Co. 33 So. 2d 693 La. 1947
Perot v. Police Jury 22 So. 2d 666 La. 1945
Louisiana State Department of Agriculture v. Sibille 22 So. 2d 202 La. 1945
Bethlehem Supply Co. v. Pan-Southern Petroleum Corp. 20 So. 2d 737 La. 1944
Womack v. Varnado 16 So. 2d 825 La. 1943
Henry v. Reid 10 So. 2d 681 La. 1942
* * *» , , after citing authorities from other States, the Court pointed out that the spirit and purpose of the above quoted part of the article and section of our Constitution was to give the public time to become acquainted with the provisions of the new law and to afford it an opportunity to comply with' it