Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jackson v. American Employers' Ins. Co., 11 So. 2d 225.

35 citing documents.

Ray v. Alexandria Mall 434 So. 2d 1083 La. 1983
Langlinais v. Guillotte 407 So. 2d 1215 La. 1981
Co., , (1942); Stewart v. Maloney Trucking and Storage, Inc., (La.App.
Clark v. McDonald's System, Inc. 383 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Co., , , plaintiff cited an incorrect insurer.
Gradney v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 375 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
The situation in the instant case is very similar to that presented in Jackson v. American Employers’ Insurance Company, , (1942).
Meadoux v. Hall 369 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Dickinson v. Maryland Casualty Co. 364 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Co., , (1942), which established the following rule: “Where three insurance companies were doing business as a group under the title “The Employers’ Group of Boston, Mass.”, letterheads of which bore the names of all three companies, having the same office for their claim department, the same telephone, same m
Conner v. Continental Southern Lines, Incorporated 294 So. 2d 485 La. 1974
Pearson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company 281 So. 2d 724 La. 1973
(1942); Lunkin v. Triangle Farms, Inc., 208 La.
Wilton Jones Company v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 248 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
Miller v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 250 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Hayes v. Muller 243 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Brady v. Bernard 230 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Co., , (1942); and in Andrepont.
Saxon v. Fireman's Insurance Co. of Newark, NJ 224 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
Co., , ; Brooks v. Wiltz, La.App.
Jacobs v. Harmon 197 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
Co., , , Gueble v. Town of Lafayette, 118 La.
Stewart v. Maloney Trucking & Storage, Inc. 147 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
and Lunkin v. Triangle Farms, Inc., 208 La.
Brooks v. Wiltz 144 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
*415 , , in support of his contention that the citation issued to Elsworth G. Wiltz was sufficient to interrupt prescription as against Ellis G. Wiltz.
McKay v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Company 123 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Martin v. Mud Supply Company 119 So. 2d 484 La. 1960
The majority rely on three cases, viz., Jackson v. American Employers’ Insurance Co., , ; Lunkin v. Triangle Farms, 208 La.
Banks v. K & H Stock Farm 97 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Banks v. Kent Piling Co. 87 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Co., , ; Lunkin v. Triangle Farms, 208 La.
Andrepont v. Ochsner 84 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
in which both the Norwich Union Indemnity Co. v. Judlin & Whitmire and Gueble v. Town of Lafayette cases were cited, the facts were that three insurance companies were doing business as a group under the title "The Employers' Group of Boston, Mass.," letterheads of which bore the names of all thre
Gilmore v. State 79 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
See also Jackson v. American Employers *198 Insurance Company, , .
Davis v. Lewis & Lewis 78 So. 2d 173 La. 1954
Davis v. Lewis & Lewis 78 So. 2d 173 La. 1954
Schrader v. Coleman E. Adler & Sons, Inc. 72 So. 2d 872 La. 1954
Davis v. Lewis & Lewis 60 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
Unless the allegations of the original petition and the prayer thereof and the testimony taken on the trial of the plea of prescription bring this case under the ruling of the Supreme Court in Lunkin v. Triangle Farms, supra, , , and Broussard v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co., D.C.W.D.
Houeye v. St. Helena Parish School Board 56 So. 2d 413 La. 1951
86 ; Jackson v. American Employers’ Insurance Company, , ; Lunkin v. Triangle Farms, Inc., 208 La.
Buford v. Combs 50 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
538 , ; Nelken v. Harrison, La.App., ; , ; Norwich Union Indemnity Company v. Judlin & Whitmire, 7 La.App.
Commercial Fire & Casualty Co. v. T. W. Kleinpeter Const. Co. 47 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
Achord v. Holmes 34 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
For instance, , , it was shown that the real defendant insurance corporation was one of a group of insurance companies doing business under a group title, the group maintained only one claim office in the city of New Orleans from which all correspondence emanated and because of the method under which they conducted the
Bowerman v. Pacific Mut. Ins. 34 So. 2d 53 La. 1948
Co., , ; Lunkin v. Triangle Farms, Inc., 208 La.
Bowerman v. Pacific Mut. Ins. Co. 34 So. 2d 53 La. 1948
Co., , ; Lunkin v. Triangle Farms, Inc., 208 La.
Ruffin v. Blue Plate Foods 29 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1947
Lunkin v. Triangle Farms, Inc. 23 So. 2d 209 La. 1945
The decision in Jackson v. American Employers’ Insurance Company, , , seems to be appropriate here and decisive of the plea of prescription und.er consideration.
Lunkin v. Triangle Farms 19 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
Co., , , it was held that the one year prescription in a damage suit was interrupted where one of a group of three separate insurance companies operating from the same office, with a common office force and under the management of the same claim agent was erroneously sued, the court holding that, although the