Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Housing Authority of Shreveport v. Green, 8 So. 2d 295.

48 citing documents.

State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Johnson 341 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Monroe Redevelopment Agency v. T. D. L. Corp. 321 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Defendant bases this argument on the constitutional mandate of “just and adequate compensation” and cites as authority for this contention, , (1942); State, and State
State, Department of Highways v. LeBlanc 319 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
State, Department of Highways v. Osbon 292 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
887 , (1959); , (1942); (La.
State, Department of Highways v. Crow 286 So. 2d 353 La. 1973
2d 37 (1953); , (1942); Dakin and Klein, Eminent Domain in Louisiana, Chapter IV, Section 1, p. 154 (1970).
State, Department of Highways v. Blair 285 So. 2d 212 La. 1973
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Smith 270 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
887 , 116 So,2d 703; , .
Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. Marbury 268 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
State, Department of Highways v. Spera 272 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
State, Department of Highways v. Smith 272 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
740 , (1966); , (1942); State v. Barrow, 238 La.
Orleans Parish School v. Montegut, Inc. 255 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
Orleans Parish School Board v. Schuler 200 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
In an effort, however, to find some practical standard, the courts early adopted, and have retained, the concept of market value * * *” (emphasis supplied) , , we find the following statement, which is quoted with approval in State of Louisiana through the Department of Highways v. Barrow, 238 La.
Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Greenwald 188 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
(1942); State Through Dept. of Highways v. Barrow, 238 La.
Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. Roy 198 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
The ‘just and adequate compensation to which an owner of property taken in expropriation proceedings is entitled is the full and perfect equivalent of the property taken, that is, the loss caused the owner by the taking, so that the owner shall be put in as good position pecuniarily as he would have been if the property had not been taken.’ “ , (1942); State Through Department of Highways v. Barrow, 238 La.
Petrovich v. State 181 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
City of New Orleans v. Thieler 181 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Mr. Gremillion testified and gave a detailed analysis of the value of the improvements, viz.: *59 , , in which the court held: “ * * * The general rule is that the measure of compensation to be awarded the owner in expropriation proceedings is the price which would be agreed upon at a voluntary sale between an owner willing to sell and a purchaser willing to buy — in other words, the market value of th
City of New Orleans v. Dromgool 166 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
State, Dept. of Highways v. Ouachita Parish Sch. Bd. 162 So. 2d 397 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
(See footnote 22, , 8 So.(2d) 295; Greater Baton Rouge Port Comm.
State, Department of Highways v. Burleigh 160 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
The law is succinctly stated in Louisiana Power & (1st Cir.App.1955) as follows: "While `consequential' damages, such as additional discomfort or loss of esthetic values, are not per se compensable, , ; yet if they are such as to diminish the commercial value of the remaining property, they are properly considered in determining the award to the landowner, Schneidau v. Louisiana Highway Commission, 206 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Acme Brick Co. 162 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Still less can compensation be awarded for speculative and imaginary business losses.” , , the Supreme Court held as follows: “Defendants claimed damages of $500 for the loss of music pupils.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Caldwell Bros. Real Estate, Inc. 155 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
463, ; Texas Gas Transmission Corporation v. Fuselier (3rd Circuit, 1961, writs denied), La.App., ; State through the Department of Highways v. Cook et al. (2nd Circuit, 1960, writs denied), La.App., .
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Crockett 151 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Bourgeois 146 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
It is well settled that the measure of compensation to be awarded an owner of property in expropriation proceedings is the market value — that is, a price which would be agreed upon at a voluntary sale between a willing seller and purchaser, , ; Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Persson, 203 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Olivier 145 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1962
Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Persson, 203 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Bundy 143 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Persson, 203 La.
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Levy 136 So. 2d 35 La. 1961
See, , ; Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Callahan, La.App., ; Rapides Parish School Board v. Nassif, 232 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Stoer 133 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
For instance, , , 298: “ * * * The compensation to which the owner is entitled is the full and perfect equivalent of the property taken — in other words, the loss caused to him by the taking.
State v. Gras 131 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
657 , ; , ; State v. Crockett, La.App.2d Cir., 1961, .
State v. Crockett 131 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. McNeely 130 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Persson, 203 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Havard 118 So. 2d 131 La. 1960
Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Persson, 203 La.
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Central Realty Investment Co. 117 So. 2d 261 La. 1960
Our jurisprudence is well established that the measure of compensation to be awarded in expropriation cases is the market value of the property — that is, a price which would be agreed upon at a voluntary sale between a willing seller and purchaser ( , ; City of New Orleans v. Noto, 217 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Esnard 117 So. 2d 52 La. 1960
Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Persson, 203 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Hub Realty Co. 118 So. 2d 364 La. 1960
2d 261, 263 , “Our jurisprudence is well established that the measure of compensation to be awarded in expropriation cases is the market value of the property- — -that is, a price which would be agreed upon at a voluntary sale between a willing seller and purchaser ( , ; City of New Orleans v. Noto, 217 La.
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Barber 115 So. 2d 864 La. 1959
262 , , and the cases cited therein: , .
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Mortallaro 101 So. 2d 450 La. 1958
Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Persson, 203 La.
STATE, DEPT. OF HWYS. v. Sauls 99 So. 2d 97 La. 1958
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Ragusa 99 So. 2d 20 La. 1958
Housing Authority of Shreve *55 , ; Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Persson, 203 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Sauls 99 So. 2d 97 La. 1958
Housing Authority v. Waters 96 So. 2d 560 La. 1957
City of New Orleans v. Noto, 217 La.
Britt v. City of Shreveport 83 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
1942, ; Carter v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App.1942, ; Housing Authority of Shreveport v. Green, 1942, , ; Texas Pipeline Company v. National Gasoline Company of Louisiana, Inc., 1943, 203 La.
Caddo Parish School Board v. Bland 82 So. 2d 687 La. 1955
City of New Orleans v. Noto, 217 La.
Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Dileo 79 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
While "consequential" damages, such as additional discomfort or loss of esthetic values, are not per se compensable, , ; yet if they are such as to diminish the commercial value of the remaining property, they are properly considered in determining the award to the landowner, Schneidau v. Louisiana Highway Commission, 206 La.
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Hebert 78 So. 2d 528 La. 1955
Contending for an increase in the value of the improvements from $1,900 to $12,000, appellant’s , , 298 and Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Boudwine, supra, in the former of which this court stated: “In cases where there is no market value *118 for a residence sought to he expropriated, the intrinsic value, or its value to the owner, must be taken into consideration * They direct attention, in th
Housing Authority v. Boudwine 71 So. 2d 541 La. 1954
City of New Orleans v. Noto, 217 La.
Housing Authority v. Brinkmann 69 So. 2d 37 La. 1953
“The general rule is that the measure of compensation to be awarded the owner in expropriation proceedings is the price which would be agreed upon at a voluntary sale between an owner willing to sell and a purchaser willing to buy — in other words, the market value of the property.
Greater Baton Rouge Port Commission v. Watson 68 So. 2d 901 La. 1953
456 , : “ 'Courts will take judicial notice that values of all kinds of property have increased materially in the past few years prior to 1951.’ “(6) , .
City of New Orleans v. Noto 47 So. 2d 36 La. 1950
It is well settled that the measure of compensation to be awarded an owner of property in expropriation proceedings is the market value—-that is, a price which would be agreed upon at a voluntary sale between a willing seller and purchaser, , S So.2d 295; Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Persson, 203 La.