Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Reeves v. Barbe, 9 So. 2d 426.

22 citing documents.

B & S EQUIPMENT CO., INC. v. Carl E. Woodward, Inc. 620 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
In Reeves v. Barbe, 200 La.1073, (1942) the Louisiana Supreme Court considered the denial of the exception of no cause of action [quoting Bossier's Heirs v. Hollingsworth & Jackson, 117 La.
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc. 616 So. 2d 1234 La. 1993
This court continued to struggle with the problem and used a , (1942).
Plaisance v. Loop, Inc. 446 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
412 (1924), , (1942), both decided before adoption of the 1960 Code of Civil Procedure.)
Criticized Taft v. City of Bossier City 401 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
412 ( , ); Succession of Nelson, 163 La.
Pruett v. City of Hunden 270 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
(1942); McGee v. Gasery, 185 La.
Matte v. Continental Casualty Company 185 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
332 ; Reeves, , ; Interdiction of Polmer, La.App.
Vehrs v. Jefferson Insurance Co. 166 So. 2d 20 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
Criticized Lindsay v. Treadaway 138 So. 2d 241 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
412 ( , ); Succession of Nelson, 163 La.
Criticized Bailey v. Texas Pacific Coal and Oil Company 134 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
412 ( , ); Succession of Nelson, 163 La.
Harris v. Primos 98 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Defendant has moved for a dismissal of the appeal upon the ground that the judgment is interlocutory, , , to the effect that no appeal lies or is authorized from such a judgment.
Distinguished Thompson v. Bamburg 93 So. 2d 666 La. 1957
cited by appellant, does not support his contention that the judgment of December 20, 1954 was interlocutory and is clearly distinguishable from the case at bar.
Breaux v. Laird 88 So. 2d 33 La. 1956
713 , ; , ; In re Canal Bank & Trust Co., 216 La.
Weilbaecher v. Jee 86 So. 2d 916 La. 1956
729 ; , ; Three Way Finance Co., Inc., v. McDonald, 213 La.
O'Rourke v. O'Rourke 69 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1954
Code of Practice, Art. 92; , ; Farrell v. Orleans Parish Democratic Executive Committee, La.App., .
Adger v. Oliver 64 So. 2d 6 La. 1953
555 ; , ; Tucker v. Woodside, 218 La.
Newman v. McClure 59 So. 2d 882 La. 1952
555 ; , ; Tucker v. Woodside, 218 La.
Martin v. Carroll 56 So. 2d 843 La. 1952
Oliphint v. Oliphint 54 So. 2d 18 La. 1951
the Bossier's Heirs, Trcka and Feitel cases were cited with approval.
Tucker v. Woodside 50 So. 2d 814 La. 1951
Angelette v. Hardie 43 So. 2d 794 La. 1949
where the same question was presented and the court dismissed the appeal ex proprio motu despite the fact that the appellant and appellee filed a joint brief contending that the appeal should not be dismissed.
Carmody v. Land 21 So. 2d 764 La. 1945
418 ; , ; Simeon v. Board of Levee Commissioners, 12 La.
State Ex Rel. Land v. Martin 21 So. 2d 481 La. 1945
the suit was predicated on a verbal joint adventure agreement covering two separate tracts of land.