Succession of Bernard
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., November 12, 1971 254 So. 2d 484; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., November 3, 1969 227 So. 2d 790; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., March 19, 1953 63 So. 2d 872; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., January 14, 1932 138 So. 674
Succession of Bernard, 24 La. Ann. 402 (1872).
Opinion text
On Rehearing. Taliaferro, J. A review of the case does not induce us to change *404 the decree already pronounced. The principal point urged in the application for the rehearing is, that there are errors of calculation to the prejudice of Mrs. Ledet, in the estimate, forming the basis of the judgment in the court below amending and approving the account of the administratrix. We think the opponent has not shown that there are such errors of calculation. It is therefore ordered that the judgment rendered by this court remain undisturbed.