Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hunter Co. v. McHugh, 11 So. 2d 495.

28 citing documents.

Davis Oil v. Steamboat Petroleum 583 So. 2d 1139 La. 1991
This precept is consistent with an implication in this Court's opinion in Hunter Co., , (1942) and usage based thereon limiting the operating party seeking to recover a non-operating party's proportionate share of costs to the exclusive remedy of withholding it from production proceeds.
Davis Oil Co. v. Steamboat Petroleum Co. 570 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
In support of its position, Humble cited the Louisiana Supreme Court’s
Exxon Corp. v. Thompson 564 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Hunter Co., , -03 (1942) (quoting Ohio Oil Co. v. Indiana, 177 U.S. 190 , 20 S.Ct.
Willis v. International Oil & Gas Corp. 541 So. 2d 332 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Amoco Production Co. v. Thompson 516 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Hunter Co., , -03 (1942) (quoting Ohio Oil Co. v. Indiana, 177 U.S. 190 , 20 S.Ct.
Nunez v. Wainoco Oil & Gas Co. 488 So. 2d 955 La. 1986
Hunter Co., , -03 (1942) (quoting Ohio Oil Co. v. Indiana, 177 U.S. 190 , 20 S.Ct.
Dunn v. Sutton 378 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
(1942), held that giving the Commissioner of Conservation his powers was not an unlawful delegation of legislative power.
Scurlock Oil Co. v. Getty Oil Co. 344 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
30:10(A)(1)(c) , (1942) to retain or receive the well proceeds until his well costs were paid and Waterbury therefore had no prior right to the proceeds.
United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Watson Oil Corp. 306 So. 2d 731 La. 1975
693 , (1944); , (1942); Childs v. Washington, 229 La.
Mobil Oil Corporation v. Gill 194 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
(1942); O'Meara v. Union Oil Co., 212 La.
Pettit v. Penn 180 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
725, 739 (1938); , (1942); National Bank of Commerce, etc. v. Board of Sup'rs, etc., 206 La.
Guarisco v. Trahan 173 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
See Hunter Co., , , and O’Meara et al. v. Union Oil Co. of California, 212 La.
Superior Oil Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining Company 165 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
Defendant contends: That, although the interested owners in a forced pooled unit are chargeable by the operator with their share of the reasonable costs of development and operation (Hunter Co., , , aff'd 320 U.S. 222 , 64 S.Ct.
Frey v. Miller 165 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
Steckler v. Continental Oil Co. 154 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
It is this uncertainty regarding the efficacy of Act 157 of 1940, which led appellee to continue to resort to voluntary pooling agreements subsequent to the effective date of Act 157 of 1940, and until the Supreme Court’s rendition of decision in Hunter Company, Inc., , , which upheld the constitutionality of Act 157 of 1940, and specifically recognized the authority of the Commissioner of Conservation to form forced pooling of drilling and production units after hearings.
Monsanto Chemical Company v. Hussey 102 So. 2d 455 La. 1958
and the authorities cited therein.
Hunter v. Hussey 90 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
mpulsory production units, the Supreme Court remarked, reciting earlier jurisprudence and a host of supporting citations: "It is recognized consistently that a statute which delegates to an administrative officer or board or commission the authority to find the facts upon which the law is to be applied is not a delegation of either the judicial or the legislative power," , , at page 500.
Sun Oil Company v. State Mineral Board 92 So. 2d 583 La. 1956
30:1 et seq.), has been held to be nonviolative of any provisions of either the State or Federal Constitution, , , appeal dismissed for want of a substantial Federal question, 320 U.S. 222 , 64 S.Ct.
Jumonville Pipe & MacHinery Co. v. Federal Land Bank 87 So. 2d 721 La. 1956
In Hunter Co., Inc., v. McHugh, , , this act was declared constitutional.
Parker v. Board of Barber Examiners 84 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
725 , at page 739; cited and approved in Hunter Co. Inc., v. McHugh, , .
Patorno v. Department of Public Safety, Drivers' License Division 76 So. 2d 534 La. 1954
745 , , it is further stated: “In the case of Hunter Co., Inc., , , we went at length into the question of the fact finding powers delegated to the conservation commissioner and pointed out that it was not a delegation of either judicial or legislative power.
Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. Southwest Natural Production Co. 60 So. 2d 9 La. 1952
693 , ; So.2d 495 ; Hunter Co. v. Shell Oil Co., 211 La.
Everett v. Phillips Petroleum Co. 51 So. 2d 87 La. 1950
Crichton v. Lee, 209 La.
O'Meara v. Union Oil Co. of California 33 So. 2d 506 La. 1947
In the case of Hunter Co. Inc., , , we went at length into the question of the fact finding powers delegated to the conservation commissioner and pointed out that it was not a delegation of either judicial or legislative power.
Ohio Oil Co. v. Kennedy 28 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
The Supreme Court held in that case that plaintiffs were not entitled to cancellation of the lease after the expiration of the five year primary term because of failure to drill a well on the particular forty acres, and also passed on the constitutionality of Act No. 157 of 1940 as it had previously done in the cases of Hunter Co., Inc., , ; Alston v. Southern Production Co., Inc., et al., 207 La.
Crichton v. Lee 25 So. 2d 229 La. 1946
The leading case decided by this court is that of Hunter Co., Inc., et al. v. McHugh, *571 , .
Alston v. Southern Production Co. 21 So. 2d 383 La. 1945
Id., 320 U.S. 222 , 64 S.Ct.
Hardy v. Union Producing Co. 20 So. 2d 734 La. 1944
Thus, , ; Id., 320 U.S. 222 , 64 S.Ct.