Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Buckley v. Catlett, 13 So. 2d 384.

22 citing documents.

Windward Land, LLC and Michael Morris Gulley versus Mary Lee Mann and William Lamont Frazier, Alvin Edwards and … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
Marks v. Zimmerman Farms, LLC 13 So. 3d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See also, Buckley v. Catlett, [ , (1943) ]; Emmer v. Rector, [ 175 La.
Brown v. Wood 451 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
444 , (1957); , (1943); Emmer v. Rector, 175 La.
Trahan v. Broussard 206 So. 2d 82 La. 1968
833 ; , ; Labarre v. Rateau, supra; and Lee v. Jones, 224 La.
Giroir v. Dumesnil 184 So. 2d 1 La. 1966
Art. 3499; , ; Generes v. Bowie Lumber Co., 143 La.
Noel v. Jumonville Pipe & Machinery Co. 148 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Stutson v. McGee 130 So. 2d 403 La. 1961
Mills v. Butler 131 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
“ , , the Supreme Court held that: * * On this subject, it is well established in our jurisprudence that, for the purpose of claiming land under the prescription of 30 years, several successive possessors cannot be joined to show a continuous adverse possession, unless there is a privity of estate or contra
Stutson v. McGee 125 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
In Buckley v. Catlett, 1943, , , the court in discussing the tacking on of possession, had this to say: “ ‘On this sub j ect, it is well established in our jurisprudence that, for the purpose of claiming land under the prescription of 30 years, several successive possessors cannot be joined to show a continuous adverse possessio
Wiggs v. Warren Realty Co. 106 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
588 , ; , ; Pan American Production Co. v. Robichaux, 200 La.
Roberson v. Green 91 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
54, ; Sibley v. Pierson, 125 La.
Koerber v. City of New Orleans 84 So. 2d 454 La. 1955
666 , ; Buckley *915 v. Catlett, , ; Waterman v. Tidewater Associated Oil Co., 213 La.
Richey v. Hill 84 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
See Coats v. Lee, La.App.1954, ; Beam v. Dudding, La.App.1949, ; Buckley v. Catlett, 1943, , ; Sibley v. Pierson, 1910, 125 La.
Finley v. Morgan 80 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
1, p, 1007.” Later, in reviewing the jurisprudence on the subject, , , 386: “On several occasions this court has declared Civil Code, Article 3548, to be merely an affirmance of Civil Code, Article 3499, by which the ownership of immovable property is acquired by 30 years’ possession.
Richardson & Bass v. Board of Levee Commissioners 77 So. 2d 32 La. 1954
Jowers v. Coats 76 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
cited and followed by this court in Merritt v. Smith, La.App., , it would appear that this circumstance would be destructive of plaintiffs’ plea, but we do not so conclude.
Thurmon v. Hogg 72 So. 2d 500 La. 1954
ends, leaving no interval for the constructive possession of the true owner to intervene, such two possessions are blended into one, and the limitation period upon the right of such owner to reclaim the land is thereby continued; indeed, the purpose of a continuous possession is the continuous ouster of the owner.” See also 1 American Jurisprudence p. 880.’ “ , , the defendant sought to assert title to the involved property by the acquisitive prescription of thirty years by tacking on to his pos
Coats v. Lee 70 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
In Buckley v. Catlett, 1943, , , the court in discussing the tacking on of possession, had this to say: "On this subject, it is well established in our jurisprudence that, for the purpose of claiming land under the prescription of 30 years, several successive possessors cannot be joined to show a continuous adverse possession, u
Lee Lumber Co. v. Melcher 43 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
Beam v. Dudding 43 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
Merritt v. Smith 35 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
11 ; , ; Broussard v. Broussard, 8 La.
Labarre v. Rateau 26 So. 2d 279 La. 1946
768 ; Buckley v. Catlett, 203 La., 54 , .