DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Price, 13 So. 2d 240.

25 citing documents.

  • In Re Succession of Haydel 780 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • Succession of Russell 590 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    On this subject we said in , , that: "`To determine the intention of the testator the whole will is to be taken into consideration.
  • Succession of Jones 377 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
    15 ; , ; Succession of Lacoume, 205 La.
  • Matter of Succession of Jones 369 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
  • McNeely v. Garrett 295 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
  • Succession of Martin 262 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
  • Succession of Glaze 203 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
    164 ; , ) endeavored to find the true intent of the testatrix from an examination of the other dispositions in the will.
  • Succession of Barry 196 So. 2d 265 La. 1967
    15 ; , ; Succession of Lacoume, 205 La.
  • Succession of Jarreau v. Succession of Jarreau 184 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
  • Giroir v. Dumesnil 184 So. 2d 1 La. 1966
    457 , ; , ; and Succession of Vatter, 192 La.
  • Succession of Mulqueeny 181 So. 2d 384 La. 1965
    In , , the Court said: “The true rule in the interpretation of testaments is that ‘the intention of the testator must principally be endeavored to be ascertained, without departing, however, from the proper signification of the terms of the testament.’ Civil Code, Article 1712; Succession of McBurney, 165 La
  • Succession of Jones 172 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
    Succession of La Barre, 179 La.
  • Succession of Mulqueeny 172 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    Appellees urge that in the later legacy to Miss Early, the words “or any interest I may have therein,” modify the legacy of “Homestead Stock,” and that under established rules of testamentary construction, the Court is obliged to give effect to every word, if possible without defeating the general purpose of the will, , (1943); and that the Court must therefore give such effect to the quoted words as, from the will itself, it appears the testator intended.
  • Giroir v. Dumesnil 172 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
  • Succession of Israel 163 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
  • Oroszy v. Burkard 158 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    * * *" And, in , , the same court said: "To determine the intention of the testator the whole will is to be taken into consideration.
  • Succession of Brown 146 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
  • Succession of Robert 140 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    [842] 855, , at page 855 (In Louisiana Report): “There the Court said: “ ‘As has often been announced, however, it is not within the province of courts to frame new wills for parties.
  • Condon v. McCormick 134 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
  • Succession of Formby 127 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    733 , ; , ; Succession of McBurney, 165 La.
  • Succession of Bonvillian 126 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
  • Succession of Elliott 111 So. 2d 344 La. 1959
  • Succession of Kamlade 94 So. 2d 257 La. 1957
  • Succession of Rolling 86 So. 2d 687 La. 1956
    591 , ; , ; Succession of Earhart, 220 La.
  • Succession of Lambert 28 So. 2d 1 La. 1946
    On this subject we said in , , that: “To determine the intention of the testator the whole will is to be taken into consideration.