DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite International Paper Co. v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co., 12 So. 2d 659.

21 citing documents.

  • Indigo Minerals, LLC v. Pardee Minerals, LLC 37 So. 3d 1122 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    904 , (1950); , (1943); Hunter Co. v. Ulrich, 200 La.
  • Graham v. McRae Exploration, Inc. 493 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    859 , (1943); , (1943); Lenard v. Shell Oil Company, 211 La.
  • Todd v. State, Dept. of Natural Resources 474 So. 2d 430 La. 1985
    (1943); Siegel v. Helis, 186 La.
  • Todd v. State Through Dept. of Natural Res. 456 So. 2d 1340 La. 1984
    (1943); Siegel v. Helis, 186 La.
  • Gunby v. Commercial Solvents Corporation 170 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
    The Supreme Court of Louisiana used the following language in the case of International Paper Co., v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co., , (1943) relative to the possession of minerals by a mineral servitude owner and what must be proved to defeat that possession: "* * * if the possessor of the land holds under a deed which on its face excepts the mineral rights, or if the socalled slanderer holds a recorded deed for the mineral rights, th
  • Kellogg Bros., Inc. v. SINGER MANUFACTURING COMPANY 131 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    536 , ; International Paper Company v. Louisiana Central Lumber Company, 1943, , ; Lenard v. Shell Oil Company, Inc., 1947, 211 La.
  • Lawton v. Anthony 92 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    265 , ; , ; Marks v. Collier, 216 La.
  • Russ v. Stephens 90 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    265 , ; , ; City of Shreveport v. Kahn, 194 La.
  • Baker v. Texas Co. 88 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    “After a careful consideration of the decisions of the Supreme Court of this State in the cases of International Paper Co. v. Louisiana Central Lumber Company [ ], and Ware v. Ba[u]cum [ 221 La.
  • Jantz v. Long Bell Petroleum Co. 86 So. 2d 918 La. 1956
  • Perkins v. Long-Bell Petroleum Company 81 So. 2d 389 La. 1955
    and Ware v. Baucum, 221 La.
  • Cattle Farms, Inc. v. Succession of Pautsch 81 So. 2d 424 La. 1955
    and authorities cited therein.
  • Dixon v. American Liberty Oil Company 77 So. 2d 533 La. 1954
  • Scheller v. Goode 69 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    639 , , was a jactitation suit in which the plaintiff admittedly was the owner and actual possessor of approximately 10,000 acres of land and alleged that the defendants were slandering its title to the oil, gas and other mineral rights in the land, and plaintiff claimed to have possession of the mineral rights by havi
  • Ware v. Baucum 59 So. 2d 182 La. 1952
    This is made clear in a , .
  • Jackson v. Davis 49 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    639 , , the Court stated the rule applicable to possession necessary to support the jactitation or slander of title suit in the following language : “It is well settled — and not disputed —that a jactitation suit, or an action for slander of titlé, can be maintained only by one who is in actual possession as owner, and
  • Marks v. Collier 43 So. 2d 16 La. 1949
    we stated thait a jactitation suit can be maintained only by one who is in actual possession as owner.
  • Holcombe v. Superior Oil Co. 35 So. 2d 457 La. 1948
  • Lenard v. Shell Oil Co. 29 So. 2d 844 La. 1947
    A , at page 625, , at page 660, where it was said: “It is well settled — and not disputed — that a jactitation suit, or an action for slander of title, can be maintained only by one who is in actual possession as owner, and only against one who is not in possession, of the property the title to which is sou
  • Allison v. Wideman 26 So. 2d 826 La. 1946
  • Tangipahoa Parish School Board v. Fontenberry 14 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943