Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Boxwell v. Department of Highways, 14 So. 2d 627.

72 citing documents.

Lewis MacHine & Welding Serv. v. Amite Ready Mix Co. 148 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Equitable Equipment Co. v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 146 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Smith v. Town of Vinton, 216 La.
Marquette v. Housing Authority of Opelousas 137 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
Smith v. Town of Vinton, 216 La.
Public Belt Railroad Commission v. Department of Highways 132 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Parish Council of Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Louisiana Highway & Heavy Branch of Associated General Contractors, … 131 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
38:2211, the provisions of the charter or of the code governing the City of Baton Rouge and the Parish of East Baton Rouge, supra, which require competitive bidding and a letting to the lowest responsible bidder, , ; Spahn v. Stewart, 268 Ky.
Prestridge v. Humble Oil & Refining Company 131 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
267 ; , ; and Whitney National Bank of New Orleans v. Schwob, 203 La.
Moore v. Housing Authority of City of Opelousas 125 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
*507 In brief and in oral argument attorney for plaintiff contended that the sub-con-tract and the addendum thereto between plaintiff and Marco became null and void upon the final decision in the Pittman case, supra, annulling the contract between Marco and defendant, and cited as authority Articles 21 and 1965 of the LSA-Civil Code, , ; Smith v. Town of Vinton, 216 La.
Sheridan v. Deshotel 121 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
305 ; , , and that appeals are favored, citing Rex-Metallic Casket Co. v. Gregory, La.App., , and Scott v. Scott, 218 La.
O'Brien v. Grand 118 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Weiss v. Board of Commissioners 115 So. 2d 804 La. 1959
and Makofsky v. Department of Highways, 205 La.
Scott v. Apgar 113 So. 2d 457 La. 1959
Bartley, Incorporated v. Town of Westlake 111 So. 2d 328 La. 1959
as follows: *425 “This statute in so far as it requires advertising and the obtaining of competitive bids is a prohibitory law founded on public policy.
State Ex Rel. Anderson v. Walker 98 So. 2d 153 La. 1957
Webre v. Boullion 95 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Reeves v. State 94 So. 2d 1 La. 1957
Makofsky v. Department of Highways, 205 La.
Reine v. Frederick 79 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
McLeod v. Levy 78 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Young v. Charity Hospital of La. at New Orleans 77 So. 2d 13 La. 1954
we said: "Persons cannot by their contracts `derogate from the force of laws made for the preservation of public order or good morals.'
Fried v. Bradley 52 So. 2d 247 La. 1951
267 ; , ; and Whitney Nat.
Smith v. Town of Vinton 43 So. 2d 18 La. 1949
pliance with that requirement the contract between plaintiff and defendant was rendered illegal by Section 5 of the same statute which states: “Any purchase of materials or supplies, or any contract entered into for the construction of public works, contrary to the provisions of this Act shall be null and void.” A , .
Jefferson Lake Sulphur Co. v. State 34 So. 2d 331 La. 1947
1029 , , wherein we said: “While in the modern trend there may be a gradual encroachment on the *27 hitherto sacred domain of sovereign non-responsibility, nevertheless, , , ‘ * * * a state or its agencies cannot be compelled to pay.interest * * * unless provision is made therefor by stipulation or by a specific statute, * * ” In Boxwell v. Department of Highways, 203 La.
Makofsky v. Department of Highways 18 So. 2d 605 La. 1944
While in the modern trend there may be a gradual encroachment on the hitherto sacred domain of sovereign non-responsibility, nevertheless, , , “ * * * a state or its agencies cannot be compelled to pay interest * * * unless provision is made therefor by stipulation or by a specific statute; general laws relative to the payment of interest are not applicable.” The same is true with respect to all costs other than those incurred for the t