DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Maddox v. Butchee, 14 So. 2d 4.

13 citing documents.

  • Wooley v. Lucksinger 14 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Such a contract, although clothed in concrete form, is entirely without effect and may be declared a sham at any time at the demand of any person in interest.” , Houghton v. Houghton, 165 La.
  • Succession of Merritt 581 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    (1943), the supreme court found that the following disposition contained a prohibited substitution: At my Death I donate and bequeath all the property I then own to my husband...
  • Armor Research Co. v. Thomaston 563 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    Hibernia Bank & Trust Company v. Louisiana Avenue Realty Company, 143 La.
  • Succession of Flowers 532 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    (1943), the supreme court found the following language to be a prohibited substitution, "At my Death I donate and bequeath all the property I then own to my husband Wesley Maddox after his death it is to go to my great niece Johnnie Tilley".
  • Succession of Smith 515 So. 2d 1096 La. 1987
    (1943), we allowed a claim to the marital portion to be made by way of a suit to annul the judgment following the sending of the heirs into possession and an order that the property be sold to effect a partition.
  • Succession of Terral 312 So. 2d 296 La. 1975
    *300 , (1943); Hibernia Bank and Trust Co. v. Louisiana Ave.
  • Henry v. Exchange Bank & Trust Co. 287 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    Our Supreme Court in numerous decisions have stated that the surviving Spouse can assert this right: (1) by-way of opposition to the final account of an administration of the succession, , (1943); Succession of Andrus, 187 La.
  • Succession of Henry 287 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
    Our Supreme Court in numerous decisions have stated that the surviving spouse can assert this right: (1) by way of opposition to the final account of an administration of the succession, , (1943); Succession of Andrus, 187 La.
  • Crichton v. Succession of Gredler 235 So. 2d 411 La. 1970
    252 , (1951); , (1943); Succession of McCan, 48 La.Ann.
  • Successions of Webre 172 So. 2d 285 La. 1965
    [4] , ; Houghton v. Houghton, 165 La.
  • Successions of Webre 172 So. 2d 285 La. 1965
    Houghton v. Houghton, 165 La.
  • Succession of Ryan 82 So. 2d 759 La. 1955
    another legatee named in the will is a prohibited substitution.” , , 7 and Succession of Rougon, 223 La.
  • Succession of Rougon 65 So. 2d 104 La. 1953
    858 , and Maddox v, Butchee, , .