Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wall v. Close, 14 So. 2d 19.

13 citing documents.

Louisiana Federation of Teachers v. State 171 So. 3d 835 La. 2014
Louisiana Federation of Teachers, East Baton Rouge Federation of Teachers, Jefferson Federation of Teachers, Nellie Joyce Meariman and … La. 2014
Louisiana Federation of Teachers v. State 118 So. 3d 1033 La. 2013
(1943), quoting Airey v. Tugwell, 197 La.
Cormier v. THE Ins. Co. 745 So. 2d 1 La. 1999
Louisiana Ass'n of Educators v. Edwards 521 So. 2d 390 La. 1988
Bazley v. Tortorich 397 So. 2d 475 La. 1981
State v. Cooper, supra ; , (1943).
State v. Cooper 382 So. 2d 963 La. 1980
(1943): "`If all the parts of a Statute have a natural connection and reasonably relate, directly or indirectly, to one general and legitimate subject of legislation, the statute is not considered as being open to the objection of plurality, no matter how extensively it deals with the details looking to
Walker v. Louisiana Expressway Authority 274 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
State v. Welkner 253 So. 2d 192 La. 1971
Branton v. Parker 233 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Ricks v. Department of State Civil Service, 200 La.
Sullins v. City of Shreveport 211 So. 2d 314 La. 1968
Woodard v. Reily 152 So. 2d 41 La. 1963
It matters not how comprehensive the act may be or how numerous its provisions; it does not violate such a constitutional prohibition if its language, reasonably construed, shows that it has but one main, general object or purpose, and if nothing is written into it except what is naturally connected with, and is incidental or germane to, the one purpose or object.” , .
State v. Morgan 116 So. 2d 682 La. 1959
State v. Pete, supra; , .