DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. State Mineral Board, 14 So. 2d 61.

13 citing documents.

  • Cimarex Energy Co. v. Mauboules 40 So. 3d 931 La. 2010
    Hennington v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co. of Louisiana, 194 La.
  • Henry Sanders v. State of La., Department of Natural Resources La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    6 So.2d 61 (1943), wherein it clearly defined a lake as a body of water which is more or less stagnant and is supplied by drainage.
  • Sanders v. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES 973 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    (1943), wherein it clearly defined a lake as a body of water which is more or less stagnant and is supplied by drainage.
  • Hibernia Nat. Bank v. ORLEANS REG. HOSP. 682 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    (1943), where this practice was followed, the court held that the concursus proceeding was properly brought in the parish where the oil well was located, reasoning that the action or transaction from which the concursus proceeding arose was the drilling of and successful completion of the oil well.
  • Davis Oil Co. v. Citrus Land Co. 576 So. 2d 495 La. 1991
    1974); , (1943); Miami Corporation v. State, 186 La.
  • State v. Placid Oil Company 300 So. 2d 154 La. 1974
    315 (1936); , (1943); Esso Standard Oil Company v. Jones, 233 La.
  • State v. Placid Oil Company 274 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    84 (1931), as to what constitutes a , (1943), hereinafter referred to as "first Amerada" ; Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. Case, 210 La.
  • State v. Cockrell 162 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    315 ; , ; Esso Standard Oil Company v. Jones, 233 La.
  • Johnson v. Lemons 157 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1963
    338, 351 , ; , ; Placid Oil Co. v. George, 221 La.
  • California Company v. Price 99 So. 2d 743 La. 1958
    Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. Case, 210 La.
  • Esso Standard Oil Company v. Jones 98 So. 2d 236 La. 1957
    The acts of man played a part in the results described in the case of Ama[e]rada Petroleum Corporation v. The State Mineral Board, [ ], , but, the Court held Article 509 applicable.
  • Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. Case 27 So. 2d 431 La. 1946
    “The alluvion belongs to the owner of the soil situated on the edge of the water, whether it be a river or stream, and whether the same be navigable or not, who is bound to leave public that portion of the bank which is required by law for the public use.” The case is similar to one which was decided in 1943, , .
  • State v. Aucoin 20 So. 2d 136 La. 1944