Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Black v. Black, 18 So. 2d 321.

36 citing documents.

Bordelon v. Bordelon 390 So. 2d 1325 La. 1980
1073 , (1945); , (1944).
Welch v. Welch 307 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
(1944); "[C]ustody of children of tender years should be awarded to the mother unless it would be to the greater advantage of the children for them to be entrusted to the care of the father.
Price v. Price 272 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
(Emphasis ours) " , , also applied the rule of Article 227 of the Revised Civil Code as follows: "`The fact that Mrs. Black is earning more than Mr. Black does not relieve Mr. Black of the obligation of contributing to the support of his children, although it may justify the award of a less amount than would be granted in
Marcus v. Burnett 264 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
McManus v. McManus 250 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
255 ; and the very recent case of Black v. Black, [ ] ; and Matheny v. Matheny, [ 205 La.
Couty v. Ayres 248 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
(1944), the Supreme Court of Louisiana stated at page 323: “The age and sex of the child are important considerations, and the preference is always given to the mother who is not shown to be unsuitable therefor in awarding custody of children, especially girls.
Murray v. Murray 220 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
See Black v. Black, supra [ , ]; White v. Broussard, 206 La.
Morrow v. Morrow 218 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
See Black v. Black (1944), , , and cases there cited.
Tiffee v. Tiffee 212 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Zara v. Zara 204 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
Ransom v. Mitchell 193 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Sampognaro v. Sampognaro, 215 La.
Poole v. Poole 189 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Sampognaro v. Sampognaro, 215 La.
Hoffpauir v. Meche 189 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Sampognaro v. Sampognaro, 215 La.
Schilling v. White 180 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
971 , (1941); , (1944); Sampognaro v. Sampognaro, 215 La.
West v. West 170 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
Poydras v. Poydras 155 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
(Emphasis ours) , , also applied the rule of Article 227 of the Revised Civil Code as follows: "The fact that Mrs. Black is earning more than Mr. Black does not relieve Mr. Black of the obligation of contributing to the support of his children, although it may justify the award of a less amount than would be granted in c
Stevens v. Stevens 147 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Sampognaro v. Sampognaro, 215 La.
Kaufman v. Kaufman 146 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
Sampognaro v. Sampognaro, 215 La.
Tullier v. Tullier 140 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
25 , ; , ; Wilson v. Wilson, 205 La.
Carlson v. Carlson 140 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
Qvistgaard-Petersen v. Qvistgaard-Petersen 135 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Baasen v. Baasen 133 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Sampognaro v. Sampognaro, 215 La.
Messner v. Messner 122 So. 2d 90 La. 1960
Salley v. Salley 116 So. 2d 296 La. 1959
Sampognaro v. Sampognaro, 215 La.
Sharp v. Sharp 81 So. 2d 833 La. 1955
White v. Broussard, 206 La.
Decker v. Landry 80 So. 2d 91 La. 1955
White v. Broussard, 206 La.
Fazzio v. Krieger 76 So. 2d 713 La. 1954
Civil Code, Articles 227, 229; , ; State v. Seghers, 124 La.
Kieffer v. Heriard 58 So. 2d 836 La. 1952
Sampognaro v. Sampognaro, 215 La.
Ane v. Ane 56 So. 2d 570 La. 1951
White v. Broussard, 206 La.
Donnelly v. Datusch 35 So. 2d 413 La. 1948
White v. Broussard, 206 La.
Withrow v. Withrow 31 So. 2d 849 La. 1947
White v. Broussard, 206 La.
Ard v. Ard 28 So. 2d 461 La. 1946
White v. Broussard, 206 La.
Willis v. Willis 24 So. 2d 378 La. 1945
in explaining our award of the custody of two girl children (ages seven and eleven respectively) to their mother and our annullment of the district court’s decree favoring their father, offered the following comment: “Under the provisions of the code article (157), as amended, the custody of chil
Willis v. Willis 24 So. 2d 378 La. 1945
322 , in explaining our award of the custody of two girl children (ages seven and eleven respectively) to their mother *Page 210 and our annullment of the district court's decree favoring their father, offered the following comment: "Under the provisions of the code article (157), as amended, the cust
Sanford v. Sanford 24 So. 2d 145 La. 1945
■ , , presented a situation similar to that existing in this case, for there, as here, both parents were well qualified to care for the children.
White v. Broussard 18 So. 2d 641 La. 1944
255 ; , ; and Matheny v. Matheny, 205 La.