Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rock Island, A. & L. R. Co. v. Guillory, 17 So. 2d 13.

13 citing documents.

  • Robert Wayne Hackett, Et Ux. v. Murphy Exploration & Production Co., USA La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    2 Cir. 1968), see also Rock Island, A. &
  • Hackett v. Murphy Exploration & Production Co.-USA 158 So. 3d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • Doyal v. Pickett 628 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • Amoco Production Co. v. Slaughter 491 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • Farrell v. Hodges Stock Yards, Inc. 333 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    Rock Island A. & , ; Sohio Petroleum Co. v. Hebert, La.App.
  • Hendrick v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. 212 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    In Green v. Chamberlain, La.App., (1st Cir., 1952), the First Circuit was interpreting a deed which conveyed 320 acres “less eighty eight and thirty one hundredths (88.30) acres taken by Atchaf-alaya levee board for levee purposes; * * * ” The Court in comparing this description with the one found in Rock Island, A. & , (1943) stated: “We can find no valid distinction between the description contained in the cited case and the one at bar.
  • Welsh Southern Oil Co. v. Scurlock Oil Co. 201 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    Rock Island A. & , 17 So.
  • Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Dileo 79 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    NOTES [1] While it appears that these highway rights of way unquestionably conveyed a servitude rather than a fee simple title to the State, see Article 753, LSA—Civil Code, and Rock Island, A. & , , it is unnecessary to consider them as doing otherwise.
  • Green v. Chamberlain 60 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    It is counsel for plaintiff's contention, on the other hand, that his deed does give him title to the entire tract and he cites in support thereof the case of Rock Island A. & , , the description contested therein being as follows: "A certain tract of land, together with buildings and improvement thereon situated at Easton, Evangeline Parish, Louisiana, and being the SW¼ of SW¼ of Section 37, Township 3 South, Range 1 West, Louisiana Meridian, less that portion sold to Octav
  • Emerson v. Cotton 26 So. 2d 16 La. 1946
    782 ; Rock Island, A. & , .
  • Rock Island, A. & L. R. Co. v. Gournay 17 So. 2d 21 La. 1944
    The same complaint was made on rehearing in the two other consolidated cases entitled Rock Island, Arkansas & Louisiana Railroad Co. v. Mrs. Dorcile Guillory et al. and Rock Island, Arkansas & , 1 and , 2 because the identical main issue was also involved therein.
  • Rock Island, A. & L. R. Co. v. Gournay 17 So. 2d 8 La. 1943
    154 , and , , because the identical main issue was also involved therein.
  • Rock Island, A. & L. R. Co. v. Guillory 17 So. 2d 17 La. 1943