DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Baker v. Wilder, 16 So. 2d 346.

13 citing documents.

  • Armour v. Smith 170 So. 2d 347 La. 1964
    933 , ; , ; Farrell v. Simms, 209 La.
  • Namie v. Namie 134 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
  • Adam v. Johnson 133 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
    [4] The following three cases are departures from the harsh ruling of Mulhern, insofar as the landowner in whose favor prescription is tolling is concerned: , 16 So.
  • Nolen v. Bennett 119 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
    1 , ; Baker v. Wilder, 1943, , ; Barnsdall Oil Company v. Miller, 1953, 224 La.
  • Crown Central Petroleum Corporation v. Barousse 117 So. 2d 575 La. 1960
    313 , ; , and Liberty Farms v. Miller, 216 La.
  • Alexander v. Holt 116 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
  • Hinchee v. Long Bell Petroleum Co. 103 So. 2d 84 La. 1958
    1023 , ; , ; Achee v. Caillouet, 197 La.
  • Elkins v. Roseberry 96 So. 2d 41 La. 1957
  • Barnsdall Oil Co. v. Miller 69 So. 2d 21 La. 1953
  • Smith v. Holt 67 So. 2d 93 La. 1953
    313 , , , , Placid Oil Co. v. George, 221 La.
  • Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. Thompson 64 So. 2d 202 La. 1953
  • Wise v. Watkins 62 So. 2d 653 La. 1952
    931 , ; , ; Liberty Farms v. Miller, 216 La.
  • Liberty Farms, Inc. v. Miller 45 So. 2d 610 La. 1950
    an acknowledgment by a landowner that his land is subject to certain mineral rights in favor of a person named in the acknowledgment to have the effect of interrupting the prescription by which such rights are extinguished the intention that the acknowledgment shall have that effect must be expressed in unmistakable terms.” See also Ahee v. Caillouet, 197 La, 313, , .