Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ford v. City of Shreveport, 16 So. 2d 127.

17 citing documents.

The Southern Amusement Co., Inc. v. Pat's of Henderson Seafood & Steak,inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
South. Amusement Co. v. Pat's of Henderson 871 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Cenac v. Public Access Water Rights Ass'n 851 So. 2d 1006 La. 2003
it was pointed out that the doctrine of implied dedication is well recognized in this state.
Vernon Parish Police Jury v. Buckley 829 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
St. Charles Parish School Bd. v. P & L INVESTMENT CORP. 674 So. 2d 218 La. 1996
Lichtentag v. City of New Orleans 237 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
wherein the court found an implied dedication of a street.
Jack v. Fontenot 236 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
City of Houma v. Cunningham 225 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
(1943); Wyatt v. Hagler, 238 La.
City of Shreveport v. Velotta 131 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
City of Alexandria v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad 126 So. 2d 351 La. 1961
709 ; , ; Porter v. Huckabay, 221 La.
Wyatt v. Hagler 114 So. 2d 876 La. 1959
Wyatt v. Hagler 107 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
This common law doctrine is well recognized in this State; , , and authorities therein cited.
B. F. Trappey's Sons, Inc. v. City of New Iberia 73 So. 2d 423 La. 1954
it was pointed out that the doctrine of implied dedication is well recognized in this state.
Wilson Motor Co. v. McDonald 69 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
and City of Shreveport v. Selber, La.App., , involved parts of the same street, Southern Avenue, from St.
Bonnabel v. Police Jury 44 So. 2d 872 La. 1950
which is not applicable because in that case the previous owners of the property where the street was laid acquiesced in its use by the public and did not appear or raise any objection to its use.
City of Shreveport v. Selber 21 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
We quote therefrom as follows, to-wit: " , .
Martini v. Cowart 18 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
in which the statement is made that the common-law doctrine of implied dedication is well recognized in this State.