Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lebleu, 14 So. 2d 17.

22 citing documents.

State v. Johnson 207 So. 2d 769 La. 1968
(1943) we said: “It is well established in the jurisprudence of this state that evidence can be brought before this court in a criminal case only by incorporating it in a bill of exceptions.
State v. Moye 194 So. 2d 717 La. 1967
362 , , and authorities cited; , , and authorities cited; State v. Stewart, 188 La.
State v. Sanford 181 So. 2d 50 La. 1965
405 , , and authorities there cited: , ; State v. Honeycutt, 218 La.
State v. Anderson 179 So. 2d 15 La. 1965
State v. Elfert 175 So. 2d 826 La. 1965
State v. Lecompte, 214 La.
State v. Elfert 175 So. 2d 826 La. 1965
State v. Lecompte, 214 La.
State v. Lee 172 So. 2d 678 La. 1965
For this reason such evidence cannot be considered ( , , State v. Gaines et al., 223 La.
State v. Lee 172 So. 2d 678 La. 1965
For this reason such evidence cannot be considered ( , , State v. Gaines et al., 223 La.
State v. Wilson 171 So. 2d 664 La. 1965
State v. Honeycutt, 218 La.
State v. Green 150 So. 2d 571 La. 1963
362 , ; , ; State v. Taylor, 192 La.
State v. Kelly 131 So. 2d 43 La. 1961
State v. LeBleau, 1943, , , and authorities therein cited; State v. Honeycutt, 1950, 218 La.
State v. Smalling 125 So. 2d 409 La. 1960
662 ; , ; State v. Owens, 210 La.
State v. Smalling 125 So. 2d 399 La. 1960
this Court decided once and for all the necessity of the State’s preserving a bill of'exceptions before any evidence could be brought before it on appeal.
State v. Pitcher 106 So. 2d 695 La. 1958
State v. Cannon 93 So. 2d 200 La. 1957
(and the authorities cited therein); State v. Bellam, 255 La.
State v. Bellam 73 So. 2d 311 La. 1954
and numerous authorities therein cited.
State v. Gaines 66 So. 2d 618 La. 1953
362 , ], , : “It is well established in the jurisprudence of this state that evidence can be brought before this court in a criminal case only by incorporating it in a bill of exceptions.
State v. Haddad 59 So. 2d 411 La. 1952
“In State v. LeBleu, 1943, , , it was stated: ‘It is well established in the jurisprudence of this state that evidence can be brought .before this court in a criminal case only by incorporating it in a bill of exceptions.
State v. Honeycutt 49 So. 2d 610 La. 1950
155 ; , ; State v. Phillips, 209 La.
State v. Lecompte 36 So. 2d 695 La. 1947
State v. Shushan 19 So. 2d 185 La. 1944
The attorneys for the defendants then filed an opposition to the State’s motion for an appeal and, on May 31, 1943, the judge, after hearing argument, dismissed the motion for an appeal and, at the same time, , .
State v. Shushan 16 So. 2d 227 La. 1943
that the State must reserve a bill of exceptions to a judgment sustaining a plea of prescription and dismissing the prosecution, in order to have the right to appeal from the judgment, in a case where the plea depends upon testimony taken on the trial thereof.