Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Board of Com'rs for Atchafalaya Basin Levee Dist. v. Sperling, 17 So. 2d 720.

14 citing documents.

Holleyman v. Garbarino 358 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Lasseigne v. Clement 311 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
[5] Board of Com'rs, , ; Laventhal v. Lake Investment Corporation, supra, footnote 2; Kuhn v. Sandefur, La.App., .
Laventhal v. Lake Investment Corp. 252 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Board of Com’rs., , ; Kuhn v. Sandefur, La.App., .
Board of Commissioners Caddo Levee District v. Brooks 209 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Counsel also relies upon Board of Com’ , (1944); Allen v. Morgan, La.App., (2nd Cir. 1955) and Staring v. Grace, La.
Jackson v. Hanna 206 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1968
v. Sperling, , ; Kuhn v. Sandefur, La.App., ."
Parquet v. Parquet 141 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1962
Kirn v. Pierce 102 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
v. Sperling, , ; Kuhn v. Sandefur, La.App., .
Staring v. Grace 97 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
But the party relying upon possession as an avoidance of the prescription in favor of the tax purchaser appears to have the burden of proving same, Board of Com'rs, , .
Butler v. D'Antonio 91 So. 2d 345 La. 1956
v. Sperling, , ; Di Giovanni v. Cortinas, 216 La.
Allen v. Morgan 80 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
the character of possession necessary to establish such an exception the court declared: , ' “No other possession than actual corporeal possession is sufficient to operate as a continuing protest against the tax title, and thereby prevent the peremption from accruing.” , , which case 'is also authority for the proposition that the burden of showing actual corporeal possession operating as a continuing protest against a tax title rests upon the parties asserting.-such possession.
Scheller v. Goode 69 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
v. Sperling, , , the Supreme Court reiterated the kind and nature of possession required to operate as a suspension of the prescription involved in this case by stating: "As more than five years elapsed between the recordation of the tax deed and the filing of the answer and reconventional demand of the Sperling
Kaufman v. Jackson 60 So. 2d 886 La. 1952
e, on “twenty-seven acres being an undivided one-third interest in 81 acres.” With these facts regarding possession before him the trial judge concluded that the defendants, as heirs of the tax debtor, , .
Kuhn v. Sandefur 28 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
Weaver Bros. Realty Corporation v. Vines 23 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
683 ; , ; Yuges Realty, Ltd., v. Jefferson Parish Developers, Inc., 205 La.