DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Wilson, 14 So. 2d 873.

15 citing documents.

  • In Interest of Jln 658 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Nicholas 359 So. 2d 965 La. 1978
  • State v. Layssard 310 So. 2d 107 La. 1975
    (1943), the trial judge was allowed to ask a question which cleared up a discrepancy in the testimony of two different State witnesses.
  • Doyal v. Roosevelt Hotel 234 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
    742 , ; , ; Stewart v. Kahn, 11 Wall.
  • State ex rel. Clark v. Hillebrandt 146 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Stewart v. Kahn, 11 Wall.
  • STATE EX REL. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS v. Bergeron 106 So. 2d 295 La. 1958
  • State ex rel. Board of Commissioners of the Lake Borgne Basin Levee District v. Bergeron 106 So. 2d 295 La. 1958
    .” Therefore, when the Legislature substituted the word “or” for “and”, “the statute was made to mean just what counsel for appellants say it means: (1) The commissioners shall hold their office during the term of office of the Governor appointing them, or (2) they shall hold office until their successo
  • State v. Chianelli 76 So. 2d 727 La. 1954
    It is defendant’s contention that under the interpretation first given Article 202 , , he had a right to file his motion to quash the petit jury venire at any time before trial.
  • State v. Labat 75 So. 2d 333 La. 1954
    appeal dismissed 320 U.S. 714 , 64 S.Ct.
  • State v. Michel 74 So. 2d 207 La. 1954
    The judge sustained the demurrer holding that, since the motion to quash had not been filed within three judicial days from the expiration of the term of the Grand Jury, which had returned the indictment, it could not be considered in view of the provisions of Article 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, , .
  • State v. Michel 74 So. 2d 207 La. 1954
    The judge sustained the demurrer holding that, since the motion to quash had not been filed within three judicial days from the expiration of the term of the Grand Jury, which had returned the indictment, it could not be considered in view ■of the provisions of Article 202 of the Code ■of Criminal Procedure, , .
  • State v. Coffil 62 So. 2d 651 La. 1952
  • Overruled State v. Nichols 44 So. 2d 318 La. 1950
  • State v. Ross 31 So. 2d 842 La. 1947
  • State v. Rankins 30 So. 2d 837 La. 1947
    The trial judge properly overruled the motion, as coming too late, , , appeal to the United States Supreme Court dismissed 320 U.S. 714 , 64 S.Ct.