Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Foster v. Kaplan Rice Mill, Inc., 13 So. 2d 850.

16 citing documents.

  • Succession of Jean Lipps Burke La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
    See, -253, (1943) (judgment granting a new trial is purely interlocutory and not final, and operates only as a postponement or a continuance).
  • Alvarez v. LeBlanc 996 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
  • Explained VaSalle v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 801 So. 2d 331 La. 2001
    Co., Foster v. Kaplan Rice Mill, Inc., , (1943).
  • Anderson v. Wall 464 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    1841, 2083; , (1943); Pate v. Crescent Motors Exchange, Inc., (La.App.
  • Jackson v. Watson 360 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    [3] Code of Practice Article 566; Code of Civil Procedure Article 2083; , ; Bland v. Government Employees Ins.
  • Bland v. Government Employees Ins. 334 So. 2d 231 La. 1976
    See Foster v. Kaplan Rice Mill, Inc., , (1943).
  • Bunge Corporation v. Emmons 320 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
  • Miller v. Chicago Insurance Company 320 So. 2d 134 La. 1975
    429 (1936); Foster v. Kaplan Rice Mill, Inc., , (1943); (La.App.
  • Simmons v. Beauregard Parish School Board 284 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
    Art. 2083; , ; and Pate v. Crescent Motors Exchange, Inc., La.App., .
  • Isbell v. Pankratz 284 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
    (1943), concerning the delays to apply for a new trial: "A judgment is not rendered until it is signed by the district judge."
  • Pate v. Crescent Motors Exchange, Inc. 256 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
    [3] , ; Elchinger v. Lacroix, 192 La.
  • Hooter v. Farrar 113 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    884 , ; Foster v. Kaplan Rice Mill, Inc., , ; Vidrine v. Soileau, La.App., ; Mills v. Knox, La.App., ; Clement v. Pointe Coupee Parish School Board, La.App., ; Johnson v. Hunter, La.App., .
  • Edmisten v. Marks 75 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    Viator v. Heintz, 201 La, 884, ; , ; La.Law Rev., Vol.
  • Meyer v. Esteb 75 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
  • Snuggs v. Burrus 67 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    We feel that we should not close the discussion of the matter without calling attention to a decision of the Supreme Court rendered in Foster v. Kaplan Rice Mill, Inc., , , in which the Court held that a judgment is not “rendered” until it is signed.
  • Mills v. Knox 55 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    884 , ; Interstate Electric Co. v. Interstate Electric Co. of Shreveport, Inc., La.App., ; Allen et al. v. Sullivan et al., La.App., ; Foster v. Kaplan Rice Mill, Inc., et al., , .