Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite City of Monroe v. Ducas, 14 So. 2d 781.

23 citing documents.

  • State v. Fairman 173 So. 3d 1278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    However, that right is only available where the arrest is illegal and is tempered by the requirement that in preventing such illegal restraint of his liberty, he may use only “such force as may be | snecessary.” , (1943).
  • State v. Trepagnier 982 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    However, the right to resist is only available where the arrest is illegal and is tempered by the requirement that in preventing such an illegal restraint of the person's liberty, he may use only "`such force as may be necessary.'" State v. Ceaser, supra ( , (1943)).
  • State v. Ceaser 859 So. 2d 639 La. 2003
  • State v. Sims 851 So. 2d 1039 La. 2003
  • State v. Ceaser 828 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Sims 823 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    This court proclaimed Louisiana’s , (1943), stating that: The right of personal liberty is one of the fundamental rights guaranteed to every citizen, and any unlawful interference with it may be resisted.
  • City of Carencro v. Faulk 715 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. Smith 686 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    979, , 784 (1943), “The right of personal liberty is one of the fundamental rights guaranteed to every citizen, and any unlawful interference with it may be resisted.” However, defendant’s argument that he was resisting an unlawful arrest ignores the fact that his arrest was pursuant to a war *143 rant
  • City of Monroe v. Goldston 661 So. 2d 428 La. 1995
  • Melancon v. Trahan 645 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Stowe 635 So. 2d 168 La. 1994
    (1943), stating that: The right of personal liberty is one of the fundamental rights guaranteed to every citizen, and any unlawful interference with it may be resisted.
  • City of West Monroe v. Cox 511 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    (1943) and authorities cited supra.
  • Fontenot v. Fontenot 499 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    and City of Monroe v, Ducas, , (1943).
  • State in Interest of WB 461 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    (1943); White v. Morris, supra; Norrell v. City of Monroe, supra; State v. Lindsay, supra.
  • State v. Lamb 458 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Every person has a right to resist an unlawful arrest; and, in preventing such illegal restraint of his liberty, he may use such-force as may be necessary.” , (1943).
  • State v. Miller 440 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    (1943), which hold that a citizen has a right to resist an unlawful arrest.
  • State v. Fontenot 410 So. 2d 1112 La. 1982
    [3] , (1943), in which we said: The right of personal liberty is one of the fundamental rights guaranteed to every citizen, and any unlawful interference with it may be resisted.
  • State v. Lindsay 388 So. 2d 781 La. 1980
  • Norrell v. City of Monroe 375 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
    (1943); and the physical attack of a private citizen by a police officer absent a valid arrest constitutes a battery
  • White v. Morris 345 So. 2d 461 La. 1977
    *466 , (1943); City of New Orleans v. Lyons, supra .
  • City of New Orleans v. Lyons 342 So. 2d 196 La. 1977
    (1943) that: "The right of personal liberty is one of the fundamental rights guaranteed to every citizen, and any unlawful interference with it may be resisted.
  • State v. Lopez 235 So. 2d 394 La. 1970
    “A prosecution will not lie for resisting an officer where the officer is attempting to make an unlawful arrest.” City of Monroe v. Ducas, et al., , .
  • Granier v. Odom 167 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1964
    760 , , are concerned only with arrests by police officers in the ordinary course of their work and with probable ■cause therefor; none of them involve execution of a direct court order.