Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite City of Monroe v. Ducas, 14 So. 2d 781.
-
State v. Fairman
173 So. 3d 1278
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
However, that right is only available where the arrest is illegal and is tempered by the requirement that in preventing such illegal restraint of his liberty, he may use only “such force as may be | snecessary.” , (1943).
-
State v. Trepagnier
982 So. 2d 185
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
However, the right to resist is only available where the arrest is illegal and is tempered by the requirement that in preventing such an illegal restraint of the person's liberty, he may use only "`such force as may be necessary.'" State v. Ceaser, supra ( , (1943)).
- State v. Ceaser 859 So. 2d 639 La. 2003
- State v. Sims 851 So. 2d 1039 La. 2003
- State v. Ceaser 828 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
-
State v. Sims
823 So. 2d 1013
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
This court proclaimed Louisiana’s , (1943), stating that: The right of personal liberty is one of the fundamental rights guaranteed to every citizen, and any unlawful interference with it may be resisted.
- City of Carencro v. Faulk 715 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
-
State v. Smith
686 So. 2d 137
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
979, , 784 (1943), “The right of personal liberty is one of the fundamental rights guaranteed to every citizen, and any unlawful interference with it may be resisted.” However, defendant’s argument that he was resisting an unlawful arrest ignores the fact that his arrest was pursuant to a war *143 rant
- City of Monroe v. Goldston 661 So. 2d 428 La. 1995
- Melancon v. Trahan 645 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
-
State v. Stowe
635 So. 2d 168
La. 1994
(1943), stating that: The right of personal liberty is one of the fundamental rights guaranteed to every citizen, and any unlawful interference with it may be resisted.
-
City of West Monroe v. Cox
511 So. 2d 1200
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
(1943) and authorities cited supra.
-
Fontenot v. Fontenot
499 So. 2d 958
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
and City of Monroe v, Ducas, , (1943).
-
State in Interest of WB
461 So. 2d 366
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
(1943); White v. Morris, supra; Norrell v. City of Monroe, supra; State v. Lindsay, supra.
-
State v. Lamb
458 So. 2d 551
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Every person has a right to resist an unlawful arrest; and, in preventing such illegal restraint of his liberty, he may use such-force as may be necessary.” , (1943).
-
State v. Miller
440 So. 2d 867
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
(1943), which hold that a citizen has a right to resist an unlawful arrest.
-
State v. Fontenot
410 So. 2d 1112
La. 1982
[3] , (1943), in which we said: The right of personal liberty is one of the fundamental rights guaranteed to every citizen, and any unlawful interference with it may be resisted.
- State v. Lindsay 388 So. 2d 781 La. 1980
-
Norrell v. City of Monroe
375 So. 2d 159
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
(1943); and the physical attack of a private citizen by a police officer absent a valid arrest constitutes a battery
-
White v. Morris
345 So. 2d 461
La. 1977
*466 , (1943); City of New Orleans v. Lyons, supra .
-
City of New Orleans v. Lyons
342 So. 2d 196
La. 1977
(1943) that: "The right of personal liberty is one of the fundamental rights guaranteed to every citizen, and any unlawful interference with it may be resisted.
-
State v. Lopez
235 So. 2d 394
La. 1970
“A prosecution will not lie for resisting an officer where the officer is attempting to make an unlawful arrest.” City of Monroe v. Ducas, et al., , .
-
Granier v. Odom
167 So. 2d 531
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1964
760 , , are concerned only with arrests by police officers in the ordinary course of their work and with probable ■cause therefor; none of them involve execution of a direct court order.