Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Charbonnet v. Board of Architectural Examiners, 17 So. 2d 261.

13 citing documents.

Poole v. Louisiana Board of Electrolysis Examiners 964 So. 2d 960 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
(1944), mandamus was issued to the Board compelling it to issue the plaintiff a license to practice the profession of architecture in Louisiana.
Durham v. LA. STATE RACING COM'N 449 So. 2d 475 La. 1984
See, , (1944); Realty Mart, (La.
Benson & Gold Chev. v. La. Motor Veh. Com'n 403 So. 2d 13 La. 1981
See, e. g., , (1944); Realty Mart, (La.
Foti v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 358 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
(1944), the Supreme Court affirmed a judgment issuing a mandamus to compel the defendant Board of Architectural Examiners to issue relator a license to practice as an architect.
Realty Mart, Inc. v. Louisiana Bd. of Tax Appeals 336 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
State Ex Rel. Hayes v. Louisiana State Board of Barber Examiners 208 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Reynolds v. Louisiana Board of Alcoholic Beverage Control 181 So. 2d 377 La. 1965
Smith Milk Co. v. Pearce 129 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Had the Legislature intended that the applicant be a graduate of an accredited college, we believe that the Legislature would have so provided.” , .
Pearce v. Kramer 128 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
1034 ; Werner v. United States of America, 7 Cir., 264 F.2d 489 ; , ; Kramer v. State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners, La.App., .
State Ex Rel. Torrance v. City of Shreveport 93 So. 2d 187 La. 1957
Meaux v. Village of Morse, La.App., ; , ; State ex rel.
State ex rel. Gill v. Soule 61 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
While there can be no question that the general rule is as stated by the learned judge of the District Court, we believe that this case should be governed by the doctrine announced by our Supreme - , .
Kramer v. State Board of Veterinary Medical Exam. 55 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
The lower court, in its written opinion, , , wherein the Supreme Court said: "If the contention of the Board be well founded, it has the power and authority to set aside the plain provisions of the act and substitute its judgment for that of the Legislature, by refusing to recognize a diploma issued by any school of architecture in the coun
Montegut v. Louisiana State Board of Dentistry 55 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
as follows: ‘Counsel for defendants cite the case of State ex rel.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by