Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Makofsky v. Department of Highways, 18 So. 2d 605.
-
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Kass
559 So. 2d 52
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
(1944); Jefferson Lake Sulphur Company, Inc. v. State, 213 La.
-
State, Dept. of Transp. & Develop. v. Taylor
461 So. 2d 1282
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Jefferson Lake Sulphur Company
- Alexander v. STATE DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS 342 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
-
Louisiana Paving Co. v. Louisiana Department of Highways
205 So. 2d 445
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
483 , ; , ; Boxwell v. Department of Highways, 203 La.
-
Miller v. Housing Authority of New Orleans
190 So. 2d 75
La. 1966
760 , ; , ; Hamberlin v. Tangipahoa Parish School Board, 210 La.
-
State, Sabine River Authority v. Salter
184 So. 2d 783
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
(1944), plaintiff sued a state agency for breach of contract.
-
Klein v. Department of Highways
175 So. 2d 454
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
1st Cir.1943), modified on other grounds , (1944).
-
Pittman Const. Co. v. Housing Auth. of New Orleans
169 So. 2d 122
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
345 , ; , ; Hamberlin v. Tangipahoa Parish School Board, 210 La.
-
Cox v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board
165 So. 2d 667
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
345 , ; , ; Hamberlin v. Tangipahoa Parish School Board, 210 La.
-
Pontchartrain Park Homes, Inc. v. Sewerage & Water Board
159 So. 2d 774
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
887 , ; , ; Boxwell v. Department of Highways, 203 La.
-
Poirier v. T. L. James & Co.
163 So. 2d 171
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1964
Westwego Canal & Terminal Co. v. Louisiana Highway Commission, 200 La.
- Marquette v. Housing Authority of Opelousas 137 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
-
AK Roy, Inc. v. Board of Com'rs for Pontchartrain LD
117 So. 2d 60
La. 1960
The cases relied on by the defendant-appellant, , , Harrison v. Louisiana Highway Commission, 202 La.
- Weiss v. Board of Commissioners 115 So. 2d 804 La. 1959
- Gravity Drainage District No. 1 v. Key 99 So. 2d 82 La. 1958
-
State Ex Rel. Anderson v. Walker
98 So. 2d 153
La. 1957
Hamberlin v. Tangipahoa Parish School Board, 210 La.
-
Reeves v. State
94 So. 2d 1
La. 1957
760 , ; , and Jefferson Lake Sulphur Co., Inc., v. State, 213 La.
-
Reeves v. State
80 So. 2d 206
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
13:4521 , , and, as thus amended, is affirmed.
-
East Baton Rouge Parish School Board v. Ford
76 So. 2d 20
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
Brasher v. City of Alexandria, 215 La.
-
Gulf Shipside Storage Corporation v. Thames
46 So. 2d 62
La. 1950
2d 612 ; , ; Hamberlin v. Tangipahoa Parish School Board, 210 La.
- Hixson Funeral Home v. State 33 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1948
-
Jefferson Lake Sulphur Co. v. State
34 So. 2d 331
La. 1947
We next consider the question of whether interest should be allowed on the claim against the State and note at the outset that the well established general rule is that a State, as a sovereign, , , wherein we said: “While in the modern trend there may be a gradual encroachment on the *27 hitherto sacred domain of sovereign non-responsibility, nevertheless, as was recently pointed out in the case of Boxwell v. Department of Highways, 203 La.
- Department of Highways v. Whiteman Bros. 29 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
- Hamberlin v. Tangipahoa Parish School Board 27 So. 2d 307 La. 1946