DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Zinko v. Zinko, 15 So. 2d 859.

18 citing documents.

  • Lacroix v. Lacroix 742 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    (1943), presented a question of jurisdiction based upon the issue of domicile in a divorce action.
  • LaCroix v. LaCroix 742 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    (1943), presented a question of jurisdiction based upon the issue of domicile in a divorce action.
  • Wilson v. Shea 565 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
    (1943); Hyman v. Schlenker, 44 La.Ann.
  • McNamara v. Coney 566 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    (1943); Mosely v. Dabezies, 142 La.
  • Messer v. London 438 So. 2d 546 La. 1983
    NOTES [1] , (1943); Hyman v. Schlenker, 44 La.Ann.
  • Charbonnet v. Hayes 318 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    (1943); Mosely v. Dabezies, 142 La.
  • Berry v. Berry 300 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    209 , (1944); , (1943); McGee v. Gasery, 185 La.
  • Dupre v. Rochester Ropes, Inc. 216 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    (1943), our Supreme Court said: “ ‘If there be a bona fide intent to establish a domicile, and a bona fide residence of some sort, “it is immaterial whether he lived in a hired house, a boarding house or (hotel), or his own dwelling.” * * * The domicile is then “fixed,” even as soon as such residence ha
  • Gilbert v. Cowan 180 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    In order to establish such a , , wherein the court said: “Tf there be a bona fide intent to establish a domicile, and a bona fide residence of some sort, “it is immaterial whether he lived in a hired house, a boarding house or (hotel), or his own dwelling.” * * * The domicile is then “fixed,” even as soon as such residence has begun
  • King v. King 173 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
    [2] See LSA-Civil Code Articles 42 and 43; , ; Successions of Rhea, 227 La.
  • Shockey v. Shockey 149 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Article 38; , ; Successions of Rhea, 227 La.
  • Fresolone v. O'Beirne 146 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    67 ; , ; Burgan v. Burgan, 207 La.
  • Succession of Kieran 144 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    839 ; McGee v. Gasery, supra; , ; Bruno v. Mauro, supra; and Juneau v. Juneau, 227 La.
  • Bush v. Bush 95 So. 2d 298 La. 1957
    839 ; McGee v. Gasery, supra; , 15 So.
  • Bruney v. Bruney 92 So. 2d 388 La. 1956
    860 are pertinent here: “ Tf there be a bona fide intent to establish a domicile, and a bona fide residence of some sort, “it is immaterial whether he lived in a hired house, a boarding house or (hotel), or his own dwelling.” * * * The domicile is then “fixed,” even as soon as such residence has begun
  • Juneau v. Juneau 80 So. 2d 864 La. 1955
    “A married woman has no other domicile than that of her husband; * * * ” Article 120 of the LSA-Civil Code states: “The wife is bound to live with her husband and to follow him wherever he chooses to reside; the husband is obliged to receive her and to furnish ■her, with whatever is required for the ..convenience of life, in proportion to his means and condition.” In the " , , this Court stated: “The domicile of a married woman is that of her husband (R.C.C.
  • Walsh v. Walsh 42 So. 2d 860 La. 1949
    And, relying on the well-established rule that persons in the military service do not surrender their residence or domicile by being transferred to other places, , ; Spring v. Spring, 210 La.
  • Burgan v. Burgan 22 So. 2d 649 La. 1945
    e express provisions of the Revised Civil Code the domicile of a •married woman is that of her husband (Article 39) and she is bound to live with •and follow him wherever he chooses to ■reside (Article 120), but suits between ■spouses for divorce or separation from bed and board, as a general rule, “must be "brought at the matrimonial domicile established for them by the husband.” , .