Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Artigue v. Artigue, 26 So. 2d 699.

14 citing documents.

Davis v. Basemore 467 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Succession of Lyons 441 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Spell v. Foreman 430 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Succession of Orlando 419 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
(1946) The test in determining testamentary capacity is whether such capacity existed at the moment the will was made.
Succession of Kelly 305 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
259 , (1953); , (1946); -704 (La.App., 2d Cir., 1961)
Cruse v. Guzik 269 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
In conclusion he stated that, considered as a whole, the evidence is “clear and convincing that when she copied the will she lacked the mental and emotional capacity intelligently and deliberately to make decisions, with the influences of the moment, upon the serious business of disposing of all her property, or to appreciate the effects of what she was doing”, , (1946).
Succession of Brown 251 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Kemper v. Doyal 212 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
(1946) the defendant first filed a premature motion for appeal but then filed a timely application for a new trial.
Succession of Herson 127 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Succession of Holland 106 So. 2d 697 La. 1958
Cormier v. Myers 65 So. 2d 345 La. 1953
“ , , where the nuncupative will was set aside because it was confected in the manner done in this case, and because of testator’s mental incapacity.
Succession of Schmidt 53 So. 2d 834 La. 1951
and Clanton v. Shattuck, supra.
Succession of Pizzati 50 So. 2d 189 La. 1950
401 ; , ; Clanton v. Shattuck, 211 La.
Clanton v. Shattuck 30 So. 2d 823 La. 1947