Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gliptis v. Fifteen Oil Co., 16 So. 2d 471.

14 citing documents.

  • Terre Aux Borufs Land v. JR Gray Barge 803 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    In support of the trial judge's finding that the tort of trespass may be committed unintentionally under Louisiana law and jurisprudence, , (1943) and Harrison v. Petroleum Surveys, Inc., (La.App.
  • Phillips v. Town of Many 538 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • Nunez v. Wainoco Oil & Gas Co. 488 So. 2d 955 La. 1986
    (1943), which concluded that the invasion by any person into the subsurface of his neighbor's land and the extraction therefrom of minerals such as oil and gas would be a trespass.
  • Nunez v. Wainoco Oil & Gas Co. 477 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • Dickie's Sportsman's Centers, Inc. v. DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. 477 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    (1943); M & A Farms, (La.
  • Beals v. Griswold 468 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • M & a FARMS, LTD. v. Town of Ville Platte 422 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
  • Baloney v. Carter 387 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
    (1943), the Louisiana Supreme Court allowed plaintiff to recover damages sustained as a result of subsurface trespass which occurred when the defendant slant drilled into a pool of oil to which plaintiff alone possessed mineral rights.
  • Patin v. Stockstill 315 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
  • Aladdin Oil Company v. Rayburn Well Service, Inc. 202 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
    This Court will further concede that Gliptis v. Fifteen Oil Co., [ ] , establishes that an intentional or negligent trespass may result in liability for damage.
  • Breaux v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation 163 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    49 , ; , ; Ware v. Baucum, 221 La.
  • LaFleur v. Sylvester 135 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
  • Buffington v. Buffington 119 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    ct mineral operations on the land as long as the operations do not to any substantial extent interfere with the usufructuary’s enjoyment of the property — for to so hold would vest in the usufructuary veto right not accorded by law and permit him to keep the mineral rights out of commerce during the entire life of the usufruct * * , , 474: “ * * * while the owner of land is not the owner of the fugitive minerals therein, yet he has exclusive right to explore his land for the production of minera
  • Loeblich v. Garnier 113 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    909 )—might nevertheless issue to protect a lawful and peaceful possession against forcible trespasses, and damages be assessed for such unlawful disturbances *102 thereof as in the case of any other wrongful act (cf. Art. 2315, , ; Harrison v. Petroleum Surveys, La.App.