Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bologna Bros. v. Stephens, 18 So. 2d 914.
- Mayo v. Simon 646 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
- Addison v. Thompson 556 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
-
Decker v. McDaniel
121 So. 2d 850
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
949 , , citing Bologna Bros., et al. v. Stephens, et al., , .
-
Rabon v. Turner
115 So. 2d 243
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
766 ; , ; Hausler v. Nuccio, 214 La.
- Robinson v. Allen 88 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
- Southwest Steel Corp. v. Jumonville 81 So. 2d 875 La. 1955
-
Smith v. Taylor
75 So. 2d 850
La. 1954
1006 , ; , , the Court held: “ ‘The purpose of registry is that third persons may have notice of the transfer, and, if the description in the deed is só vague, indefinite, and uncertain that the property cannot be located and identified, the sale is void as to third persons who deal upon the faith of the publ
-
Horn v. Skelly Oil Co.
60 So. 2d 65
La. 1952
9 ; , ; Douglas v. Haro, 214 La.
-
Jamison v. Superior Oil Co.
57 So. 2d 896
La. 1952
9 ; , ; Douglas v. Haro, 214 La.
-
Jamison v. Superior Oil Co.
57 So. 2d 896
La. 1952
9 ; , ; Douglas v. Haro, 214 La.
-
Chiasson v. Duplechain
56 So. 2d 615
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
9 ; , ; Douglas v. Haro, 214 La.
-
Carroll v. Boosahda
51 So. 2d 836
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
Lastly, , , and the doctrine laid down in the Bonvillain case expressly re-affirmed.
-
Greer v. Sumney
50 So. 2d 503
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
ages, when the buyer knew not that the thing belonged to another person”, and based his claim to eviction upon the well-settled law that if there is a perfect outstanding title in another, this alone amounted to eviction as a matter of law and rendered it impossible for the vendor to put the purchaser in possession, relying upon Voss v. Roach, La.App., ; , , and McDonald & Coon v. Vaughan, 14 La.Ann.
-
Sanders v. Flowers
49 So. 2d 858
La. 1950
9 ; , ; Douglas v. Haro, 214 La.
-
Greer v. Sumney
41 So. 2d 526
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
App., ; , ; McDonold Coon v. Vaughan, 14 La.
- Hausler v. Nuccio 39 So. 2d 734 La. 1949
- Douglas v. Haro 39 So. 2d 744 La. 1949
-
Whitney Nat. Bank v. Little Creek Oil Co.
33 So. 2d 693
La. 1947
A , , wherein it was said that “No exception of non-joinder was filed; however, the court of its own motion may take cognizance of the lack of necessary parties.” See also Succession of Todd, 165 La.
- Bologna Bros. v. Stephens 23 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
-
Tafolla v. Jones
23 So. 2d 569
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
The latest case on this subject, decided by the Supreme Court, is that of Bologna Bros. et al. v. Stephens et al., reported in , , 917.