Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Weingart v. Delgado, 16 So. 2d 254.

22 citing documents.

  • Thomas v. Bridges 144 So. 3d 1001 La. 2014
    59, 87 , (1950); , (1943); Gaines v. Crichton, 187 La.
  • Council of City of New Orleans v. Washington 9 So. 3d 854 La. 2009
    1072 , , *857 105-06 (1959); , (1943); Gaines v. Crichton, 187 La.
  • Geiger v. State Ex Rel Dept. of Health 815 So. 2d 80 La. 2002
    1072 , -06 (1959); , (1943); Gaines v. Crichton, 187 La.
  • Boudreaux v. STATE, DOTD 815 So. 2d 7 La. 2002
    1072 , -06 (1959); , (1943); Gaines v. Crichton, 187 La.
  • Cummings v. Wafer 499 So. 2d 184 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    752 , (1943); Richardson v. Stan Weber & Associates, Inc., (La.App.
  • Richardson v. Stan Weber & Associates, Inc. 400 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    (1943); Marpco, Inc. v. South States Pipe & Supply et al., (La.App.
  • Lotz v. Hessler 369 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
    (1943); Probst v. Di Giovanni, 232 La.
  • Garlete v. Rodriguez 126 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
    456 ; , ; Probst v. DiGiovanni, 232 La.
  • Krauss Company v. Develle 110 So. 2d 104 La. 1959
  • Lambert v. Bond 102 So. 2d 467 La. 1958
    See, among others, , ; Crichton v. Lee, 209 La.
  • Williams v. Cormier 100 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    2021, 2025, 2035; , ; Morrison v. Mioton, 163 La.
  • Probst v. Di Giovanni 95 So. 2d 321 La. 1957
    r to purchase was conditioned upon his ability to secure a loan of $12,500 at a rate of interest not to exceed 5% per annum and for a period of not less than 15 years, and that this was clearly a stipulation in his favor, placed in the contract to insure his ability to finance the purchase, and that such stipulation could be waived by offering cash instead of securing a loan, , —however, the limitation of time to a period of fifteen days from acceptance of the offer was obviously inserted for th
  • Succession of Kamlade 94 So. 2d 257 La. 1957
  • Davis v. Lewis & Lewis 78 So. 2d 173 La. 1954
  • Davis v. Lewis & Lewis 78 So. 2d 173 La. 1954
  • Succession of Fertel v. Fertel 76 So. 2d 377 La. 1954
    ■ And, while a contention neither pleaded nor passed on by the district court will not be considered on appeal, , ; Crichton v. Lee, 209 La.
  • Slack v. Munson 61 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    2d 692 , , , Harvey v. Riedeinger, La.App., , Savich v. Ruiz, La.
  • Martin-Parry Corp. v. New Orleans Fire Detection Service 60 So. 2d 83 La. 1952
  • Kenney v. Wedderin 56 So. 2d 550 La. 1951
    to purchase was conditioned upon his ability to secure a loan of $12,-500 at a rate of interest not to exceed 5% per annum and for a period of not less than 15 years, and that this was clearly a stipulation in his favor, placed in the contract to insure his ability to finance the purchase, and that such stipulation could be waived by offering cash instead of securing a loan, , — however, the limitation of time to a period of fifteen days from acceptance of the offer was obviously inserted for th
  • State Ex Rel. Fitzmaurice v. Clay 23 So. 2d 177 La. 1945
  • Schroeder v. Morris 20 So. 2d 437 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
    enforceable as containing a potestative condition, , and consequently hold that the clause concerning a homestead loan is not potestative but is merely a suspensive condition and that if it is shown that that supensive condition could have been complied with, , , and as it said in Morrison v. Mioton et al., 163 La.
  • Harvey v. Riedlinger 17 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
    See Weingart v. Delgado, La.Sup., ; Stephen L. Guice Co., Inc. v. Benjamin Perkowski, La.App., ; also Morrison v. Mioton, 163 La.