Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Outdoor Electric Advertising, Inc. v. Saurage, 21 So. 2d 375.

39 citing documents.

Regina B. Heisler, Individually and as Succession representative/executrix of the Succeession of Frederick P. Heisler Versus Girod Loanco, … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
v. Saurage, –53; –78 (1945); –67 (La.
Travis Lee Stevens v. Darren Keith Bruce La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
So.2d 375; Termini v. McCormick, 208 La.
Stevens v. Bruce 878 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
[(1945)]; Termini v. McCormick, 208 La.
Powell v. Dorris 814 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Termini v. McCormick, 208 La.
Moore v. Cameron Parish School Bd. 511 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Termini v. McCormick, 208 La.
Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. STATE EX REL. DIV. OF ADMIN. 486 So. 2d 95 La. 1986
Outdoor Electric Advertising v. Saurage, 207 La.344, ; Termini v. McCormick, 208 La.221, and Bartholomew v. Impastato, La.App., .
The Research Group, Inc. v. Sharp 430 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
In Outdoor Electric Advertising, , (1945), the Supreme Court held that an exception directed to a foreign corporation's failure to comply with the applicable law does not defeat the plaintiff's action but only can retard the progress of the litigation.
Williamson-Dickie Apparel Manufacturing Co. v. Hanger, Inc. 422 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
844 , , handed down by the Supreme Court of Louisiana, is directly in point and therefore controlling on this court.” (Emphasis ours.)
Succession of Skye 417 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Southern-Gulf Marine Co. No. 9. Inc. v. Camcraft, Inc. 410 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
It should be noted that defendant has not questioned plaintiff's right to do business within Louisiana, as in Outdoor Electric Advertising, , (1945); (La.App.
Lambert v. Donald G. Lambert Const. Co. 370 So. 2d 1254 La. 1979
Marchand v. Armstrong 354 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Parks v. Winnfield Life Insurance Company 336 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Termini v. McCormick, 208 La.
Giardina v. Marrero Furniture Co. 300 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Hargroder v. Columbia Gulf Transmission Co. 290 So. 2d 874 La. 1974
Termini v. McCormick, 208 La.
West Publishing Co. v. Intrastate Pipeline Corp. 254 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
[1] , , handed down by the Supreme Court of Louisiana, is directly in point and therefore controlling on this court.
Mid-Continent Refrigerator Co. v. Hurst 205 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
1st Cir., 1960) the occasion to discuss this same point, wherein we said at page 166: “From what was said by the Supreme Court in the Outdoor Electric case (Outdoor Electric Advertising, Inc. v. Saurage, 1945, , ) and in the earlier case of Hess Warming & Ventilating Co., Inc. v. Home Comforts Corp., 1944, 205 La.
Barr v. Freeman 175 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
Termini v. McCormick, 208 La.
Cattle Farms, Inc. v. Abercrombie 155 So. 2d 426 La. 1963
In Outdoor Electric Advertising, , , we discussed the exception of no right of action, observing (among other things) that: “ * * * An exception of that kind is in the nature of, perhaps the same as, the exception to the want of interest in the plaintiff to maintain the suit.
Georgia Pacific Corp. v. B.G.M. Builders 154 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Termini v. McCormick, 208 La.
Scott v. Hunt Oil Company 152 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1963
Distinguished State v. Preferred Accident Insurance Co. of NY 149 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
In support of its contention that the exception filed by appellants is dilatory and must be plead in limine litis, appellee has cited a single authority, namely, , .
Jefferson v. Jefferson 145 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
McMahon, Parties Litigant in Louisiana, The Exception of Want of Capacity, 11 Tul.L.
Guenard v. Key 131 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
In Outdoor Electric Advertising v. Saurage, supra [ , ], we held that the exceptions of want of interest and of no-right of action are not separate exceptions but are actually the same exception under different names.
Metryclub Gardens Ass'n v. Friedrichs 121 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1960
Outdoor Electric Advertising, , ; Priest v. Browning, La.App., ; Brooks v. Smith, La.App., .
JR Watkins Company v. Floyd 119 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
[1] Discussing defendant's unnamed exception based upon this Act, the Supreme Court in Outdoor Electric Advertising, Inc. v. Saurage, 1945, , , stated: "Similar exceptions have been urged in other cases previously before the courts of this state, being designated therein by various names.
Clark v. Town of Mandeville 105 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Termini v. McCormick, 208 La.
Johnston v. City of New Orleans 101 So. 2d 206 La. 1958
Termini v. McCormick, 208 La.
Richard v. National Surety Corporation 99 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Termini v. McCormick, 208 La.
White v. Morehouse Parish Police Jury 95 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
114 ; Outdoor Electric Advertising, Inc., v. Saurage, 1945, , ; City of New Orleans v. Leeco, Inc., 1951, 219 La.
Wischer v. Madison Realty Company 92 So. 2d 589 La. 1956
Termini v. McCormick, 208 La.
Mitchell v. First National Life Insurance 91 So. 2d 788 La. 1956
McMahon, Parties Litigant in Louisiana, The Exception of Want of Capacity, 11 Tul.L.Rev.
Green v. STATE, DEPT. OF HWYS. 91 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
51 , ; Outdoor Electric Advertising, Inc., v. Saurage, , ; Verret v. Calcasieu Parish School Board, La.App.
Leteff v. Maryland Casualty Co. 82 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Termini v. McCormick, 208 La.
Roy O. Martin Lumber Co. v. Saint Denis Securities Co. 72 So. 2d 257 La. 1954
Termini v. McCormick, 208 La.
Klein v. Connell 71 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
See also Outdoor Electric Advertising, , .” It would appear that clearly these plaintiffs were entitled to invoke the remedy afforded by the law viz., a boundary action.
Vegas v. Cheramie 69 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
See also Outdoor Electric Advertising, Inc., v. Saurage, , .
Brooks v. Smith 35 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
194 ; and Outdoor Electric Advertising, Inc., v. Saurage [ ], ."
Termini v. McCormick 23 So. 2d 52 La. 1945
194 ; and Outdoor Electric Advertising, Inc., v. Saurage, .