DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Slagle v. Slagle, 17 So. 2d 923.

22 citing documents.

  • Allen v. Allen 648 So. 2d 359 La. 1994
  • Hendricks v. Hendricks 594 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    the Louisiana Supreme Court made it clear that inability to work called for the suspension of alimony awarded by the trial court for the period of the disability.
  • Bush v. Bailey 525 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • Romagosa v. Romagosa 464 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • Stolier v. Stolier 357 So. 2d 1334 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    17 , ; , ; Scott v. Scott, 197 La.
  • Acosta v. Acosta 343 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
  • Cortes v. Fleming 307 So. 2d 611 La. 1974
    646 , (1950); , (1944); Scott v. Scott, 197 La.
  • Caldwell v. Gilbert 253 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
    Slagle v. Slagle [ , ]; White v. Bendix, 206 La.
  • Johnson v. McAfee 249 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    646 , (1950); Fortier v. Gelpi, supra; , (1944).
  • Leavines v. Leavines 224 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
  • Burris v. Burris 197 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    This codal article refers to the revocation of alimony if the alimony becomes unnecessary, , (1944) and Russo v. Russo, 208 La.
  • Antis v. Derussy 175 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
  • Lockwood v. Lockwood 175 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
    (1944) is in many respects analogous to the one now before us. There the defendant was under an order of court to pay alimony to his wife.
  • Fruehan v. Fruehan 153 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
  • Jones v. Jones 93 So. 2d 917 La. 1957
    726 , ; , ; Brown v. Harris, 225 La.
  • Jones v. Jones 93 So. 2d 917 La. 1957
    726 , ; , ; Brown v. Harris, 225 La.
  • Brown v. Harris 72 So. 2d 746 La. 1954
  • Graham v. Graham 51 So. 2d 392 La. 1951
    to the effect that alimony may be adjusted to meet the changing needs of the divorced wife and the divorced husband’s ability to pay, or revoked entirely if it becomes unnecessary.
  • Smith v. Smith 47 So. 2d 32 La. 1950
  • Russo v. Russo 28 So. 2d 455 La. 1946
    866 ; , ; and Article 160 of the Revised Civil Code.” Since appellee has not contracted a second marriage, the sole question presented is whether or not the payment of alimony under the evidence here presented is necessary to meet the changing needs of the divorced wife since our previous decision denying-her a
  • Russo v. Russo 22 So. 2d 671 La. 1945
    866 ; , ; and Article 160 of the Revised Civil Code.
  • White v. Bendix 20 So. 2d 10 La. 1944