Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Doll v. Doll, 19 So. 2d 249.

24 citing documents.

  • Succession of Malcom Lamar Murray La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    So.2d 249 (1944); Succession of Williams, 168 La.
  • Succession of Doll v. Doll 593 So. 2d 1239 La. 1992
    La.Civ.Code Ann. art. 1242 (West 1987); Succession of Webre, supra ; , (1944).
  • Succession of Riggio 468 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    (1944), 19 So.2d at 251-252 , as follows: Collation is the returning to the estate of a deceased person any gifts or advances which any of the descendant heirs may have received by donation or otherwise during the lifetime of the ancestor from whom the heirs inherit.
  • Tarver v. Tarver 441 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • Succession of Williams 418 So. 2d 1317 La. 1982
    (1944); Succession of Williams, 168 La.
  • Succession of Trouard 281 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
    391 , (1952); , (1944); Succession of Webre, 247 La.
  • Succession of Higgins 275 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
    (1944), treated of the right of a co-owner to demand collation after the rendition of a judgment of possession.
  • Succession of Delesdernier 184 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
  • Jackson v. Jackson 175 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    746 , (1948); , (1944); Lamotte v. Martin, supra; Baillio v. Baillio, 5 Mart.
  • Successions of Webre 172 So. 2d 285 La. 1965
  • Successions of Webre 172 So. 2d 285 La. 1965
  • Kinney v. Kinney 150 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    in commenting on the right of collation, stated: "Collation is the returning to the estate of a deceased person any gifts or advances which any of the descendant heirs may have received by donation or otherwise during the lifetime of the ancestor from whom the heirs inherit.
  • Succession of Smith 142 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Successions of Scardino, 215 La.
  • Katz v. Sobel 126 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
  • McDonald v. Howard 84 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    Article 1290, Revised Civil Code; , .
  • Taylor v. Brown 66 So. 2d 578 La. 1953
  • Succession of Quaglino 65 So. 2d 127 La. 1953
    Successions of Scardino, 215 La.
  • Himel v. Connely 61 So. 2d 876 La. 1952
    Byrne Succession of Byrne, 215 La.
  • Succession of McGeary 56 So. 2d 727 La. 1951
    Indeed, , , affords a complete answer to all of plaintiffs' claims as, there, will be found a detailed discussion and analysis of the pertinent codal articles and prior adjudications which make it inappropriate to permit collation after the donor's succession has been closed by judgment placing the heirs in posse
  • Succession of McGeary 56 So. 2d 727 La. 1951
    Indeed, , , affords a complete answer to all of plaintiffs’ claims as, there, will be found a detailed discussion and analysis of the pertinent codal'articles and prior adjudications which make it inappropriate to permit collation *398 after the donor’s succession 'hás been closed by judgment placing the heirs in
  • Demoruelle v. Allen 50 So. 2d 208 La. 1950
  • Alexander v. Hall 45 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
  • Byrne v. Succession of Byrne 42 So. 2d 699 La. 1949
    Article 1290, Revised Civil Code; , .
  • Successions of Scardino 40 So. 2d 923 La. 1949