Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite City of New Orleans v. Westwego Canal & Terminal Co., 19 So. 2d 201.

15 citing documents.

Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. Estate of Rowe 224 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
City of New Orleans v. Westwego Canal & Terminal Co., , (1944), cited in Johnson v. American Bell Fed’l Credit Union, 2014-2551 (La.
Johnson v. American Bell Federal Credit Union 164 So. 3d 182 La. 2015
See City of New Orleans v. Westwego Canal & Terminal Co., , (1944).
Pontchartrain Materials Corp. v. Quick Recovery Coatings Services, Inc. 68 So. 3d 1113 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
In City of New Orleans v. Westwego Canal & Terminal Co., , (1944) is likewise inappo-site as it does not address the effect of La.Code Civ.
James Rider v. Priola Construction Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
1 Cir.), writ denied, (1976), citing City of New Orleans v. Westwego Canal & Terminal Co., So.2d 201 (1944).
Total Sulfide Services v. Secorp Indus. 685 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
City of New Orleans v. Westwego Canal & Terminal Co., Inc., , -202 (1944); McClure v. A. Wilbert's Sons Lumber & Shingle Company, (La.App.
ST. TAMMANY PARISH SEWERAGE DIST. v. Monjure 665 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
See City of New Orleans v. Westwego Canal & Terminal Co., Inc., , -202 (1944); McClure v. A. Wilbert's Sons Lumber & Shingle Company, (La.App.
Coffil v. Boyd 428 So. 2d 1355 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Co., , (1944), in which the dismissal under former C.C.
Bishop Homes, Inc. v. Devall 336 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
An abandoned suit cannot form the basis of a plea of res judicata, City of New Orleans v. Westwego Canal & Terminal Co., , (1944).
State, Dept. of Highways v. Ott 262 So. 2d 397 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Pounds v. Yancy 224 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Co., , , in the following language: "In any event, suits dismissed for want of prosecution under the provisions of Article 3519 of the Revised Civil Code do not decide any issues in controversy and cannot, therefore, form the basis of a plea of res adjudicata.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Rottman 213 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
City of New Orleans v. Westwego Canal & Terminal Co., Inc., , (1944) and Losch v. Greco, 173 La.
Andrieu v. Davis 205 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
De Salvo v. Waguespack 187 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
Co., , (decided in 1944), our Supreme Court said: "In any event, suits dismissed for want of prosecution under the provisions of Article 3519 of the Revised Civil Code do not decide any issues in controversy and cannot, therefore, form the basis of a plea of res adjudicata.
Lambert v. Bond 102 So. 2d 467 La. 1958
See City of New Orleans v. Westwego Canal & Terminal Co., , and authorities there cited.
Fried v. Edmiston 40 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1949