DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Buck., 23 So. 2d 215.

14 citing documents.

  • Succession of Raiford 404 So. 2d 251 La. 1981
    See the French authorities cited in , (1945) at pages 222, 223 and 224.
  • Succession of Boyd 306 So. 2d 687 La. 1975
    In the , (1945), the court concluded that the will presented was not written by the decedent, but, if it had been, it would be invalid because the dates appearing on the will were illegible.
  • South Central Bell Telephone Company v. McKay 285 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
  • Cattle Farms, Inc. v. Abercrombie 211 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
    In this litigation ( , ), he was represented by Dart, Guidry and Price, a law firm which earned a 50% interest in the Buck heirs' assets from the succession for their successful representation.
  • Succession of Koerkel 174 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
  • Succession of Bendily 132 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    In the , , the late Chief Justice O’Niell of the Supreme Court of Louisiana in an exhaustive opinion reviewed the Louisiana and French authorities on the issues presented to us for resolution.
  • Succession of Marshall 126 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    The cases relied upon by appellee are differentiated as follows: , 23 So.
  • Southwest Natural Production Company v. Anderson 118 So. 2d 897 La. 1960
  • Succession of Mutin 94 So. 2d 420 La. 1957
  • Succession of Morales 94 So. 2d 420 La. 1957
  • Succession of Reynolds 71 So. 2d 537 La. 1954
    and signed by me on this third of August, one thousand nine hundred forty five Lilian Bell Reynolds.” In support of the contention of plaintiffs that the will is uncertain of date and must fail, because of decedent’s having superimposed the numeral 8 over the numeral 5 of the year portion at the beginning of the document, their counsel rely expressly, and apparently solely, on , .
  • Succession of Muntz 63 So. 2d 426 La. 1953
    Furthermore, the date of the will is uncertain, and seems to fall under the opinion and decree of the Supreme Court of Louisiana in the •matter entitled, , .
  • Love v. Dawkins 62 So. 2d 399 La. 1952
    The latest perhaps is that of , , in which others are referred to.
  • Love v. Dawkins 62 So. 2d 399 La. 1952
    The latest perhaps is that of , , in which others are referred to.