DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Guinn v. Watson, 26 So. 2d 740.

22 citing documents.

  • Ingargiola v. Clesi 396 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Neal v. White 362 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
  • Wren v. Wren 301 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    Guinn v. Watson [ , ], supra, the courts of this state have invariably followed the rule that the ivel-fare of the child is of paramount importance in determining who is entitled to its custody in a case of this kind.
  • Borras v. Falgoust 285 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
  • Franz v. Franz 230 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
  • Creppel v. Thornton 230 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
  • Shilling v. Doyle 218 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    Guinn v. Watson, [ , ], supra, the courts of this state have invariably followed the rule that the welfare of the child is of paramount importance in determining who is entitled to its custody in a case of this kind.
  • Gallagher v. Gallagher 218 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    .” The decision of the trial judge should, therefore, not be disturbed unless it is clearly adverse to the welfare of the children.
  • Roller v. Roller 213 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
  • Distinguished State ex rel. Copell v. Marusak 205 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
  • Roy v. Speer 192 So. 2d 554 La. 1966
  • State Ex Rel. Paul v. Department of Public Welfare 170 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
  • Brunt v. Brunt 166 So. 2d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
  • Ray v. Ray 159 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
  • State ex rel. Rothrock v. Webber 155 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Guinn v. Watson [ ], (Sup.Ct.
  • Mouton v. Romain 153 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    as follows: “The rule in this state seems to be clear that the mother has a superior right to the custody of her child over third persons, but that this right must yield to the superior right of the State to deprive her of the care and possession of her child in the event the physical, mental, and moral
  • Stevens v. Stevens 147 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Guinn v. *758 Watson, , ; Kieffer v. Heriard, 221 La.
  • State ex rel. Hebert v. Knight 135 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
  • Byrd v. Byrd 128 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Kieffer v. Heriard, 221 La.
  • State Ex Rel. Paul v. Peniston 105 So. 2d 228 La. 1958
    Guinn v. Watson [ , ], supra, the courts of this state have invariably followed the rule that the welfare of the child is of paramount importance in determining who is entitled to its custody in a case of this kind.
  • Johnson v. Johnson 39 So. 2d 340 La. 1949
  • State Ex Rel. Eastham v. Traylor 29 So. 2d 43 La. 1946