DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Campasi v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n, 22 So. 2d 55.

18 citing documents.

  • Marks v. Trinity Universal Ins. Co. 531 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    533 , Campasi v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Association
  • Reichert v. Continental Insurance Company 290 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    Campasi v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Association, , ; Seguin v. Continental Service Life & Health Insurance Company, 230 La.
  • Rushing v. American Income Insurance Company 274 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
    Baker v. Louisiana Industrial Life Insurance Company, La.App., ; West v. Lincoln Income Life Insurance Company, supra.
  • Caswell v. Reserve National Insurance Company 272 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
    533 , , the Supreme Court reiterated the following language from Campasi v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n, , : "It is argued for the insurance company that, as the question of interpretation of the exempting clause in question had not been decided by a Louisiana court when this suit was filed, the company acted `upon just and reasonable grounds' in denying liability.
  • West v. Lincoln Income Life Insurance 239 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    See also: Campasi v. Mutual Benefit Health and Accident Ass’n, , (1945); Ayres v. N. Y. Life Ins.
  • Niles v. American Bankers Ins. Co. 229 So. 2d 435 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
    Campasi v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Association, , .
  • Simmons v. American National Insurance Company 199 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    Campasi v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Association, , .
  • Harmon v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company 170 So. 2d 646 La. 1965
    Campasi v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n., , .
  • Harmon v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. 170 So. 2d 646 La. 1965
    its policy at the expiration of a certain recited time “unless just and reasonable grounds, such as would put a reasonable and prudent business man on his guard, exist.” The criterion, therefore, is “just and reasonable.” “Whether such a delay is ‘upon just and reasonable grounds’ depends upon the circumstances peculiar to the case in hand.” Campasi v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass’n., , .
  • Fontenot v. Wabash Life Insurance Company 150 So. 2d 10 La. 1963
    See Campasi v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass’n, , ; Ayres v. New York Life Ins.
  • Miller v. Preferred Life Insurance 107 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    Campasi v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass’n, , ; Bankson v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass’n, 208 La.
  • Cain v. Employers Casualty Company 96 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
    Campasi v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Association, 1945, , ; Bankson v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Association, 1945, 208 La.
  • Seguin v. Continental Service Life & Health Insurance 89 So. 2d 113 La. 1956
    Campasi v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Association, , .
  • Phelps v. Southern National Insurance Company 83 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
    In Campasi v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n, , , the opinion stated: "Not only did the company fail to make payment within the thirty days required by Act 310 of 1910, but, during the remaining 15 months of the lifetime of the assured, the company failed to make any investigation or attempt to ascertain whether the disability of the assured, who
  • McKinney v. American Security Life Insurance Co. 76 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
    The Supreme Court had before it an analogous state of facts in Campasi v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Association, 1945, , .
  • Nomey v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. 33 So. 2d 531 La. 1947
  • Baker v. Louisiana Industrial Life Ins. Co. 24 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
    A , , 57, and in disposing of it, the court said: "It is argued for the insurance company that, as the question of interpretation of the exempting clause in question had not been decided by a Louisiana court when this suit was filed, the company acted 'upon just and reasonable grounds' in denying liability.
  • Bankson v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'n 24 So. 2d 59 La. 1945
    As was pointed out by this court in the very recent case of Campasi v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass’n, , , “Whether such a delay is ‘upon just and reasonable grounds’ depends upon the circumstances peculiar to the case in hand.” In the instant case the attending physician diagnosed plaintiff’s case on February 11, 1943, and almost immediately thereafter hospitalized him for treatment.