DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ohio Oil Co. v. Ferguson, 34 So. 2d 746.

20 citing documents.

  • Succession of Lucille Watts Patin, Pamela Sue Patin Quantz, Charleen Patin Taylor, Rebel Kelley Caplinger, Denis Curtin Kelley, … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
    So.2d 746, 752 (1946); Indigo Minerals, LLC v. Pardee Minerals; LLC, 45,160 (La.
  • Carolyn Plummer Sheridan v. Tommy Gordon Cassel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Caskey v. Kelly Oil Co. 706 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • Horton v. Mobley 578 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    (1947); Scott v. Hunt Oil Co., supra; see Mineral Code Arts.
  • AMOCO PRODUCTION v. McMorris 552 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • Board of Com'rs v. Percle 535 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    520 , (1966); , (1946); Lee v. Giauque, 154 La.
  • Allied Chemical Corp. v. Dye 441 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    Harriet Daggett, the renowned authority in the field of Louisiana mineral rights, in her well-known book, "Daggett on Louisiana Mineral Rights (Revised Edition)", states in § 7 of her book, , (1947), "...
  • Allied Chemical Corp. v. Despot 414 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
    417 , (1953)], and if the mineral owner can divide the advantages of a servitude by assigning to a third person all of his interest in a designated portion of the land affected by the servitude and create a situation whereby user of a portion would not hold the remainder, as held in Ohio Oil Co. v. Ferguson, supra [ , (1946)], and Byrd v. Forgotson, supra [ 213 La.
  • Continental Group, Inc. v. Allison 404 So. 2d 428 La. 1981
    520 , (1966): "In the evolution of the mineral law in the State, it was recognized that the sale or reservation of a mineral right, having been classed as a servitude, was subject to the applicable articles of the Civil Code in the resolution of conflicting claims; and in deciding the early and landmark case of Ohio Oil Co. v. Ferguson [ , ], supra, the precedent upon which succeeding decisions, including Childs v. Washington [ 229 La.
  • Armstrong v. RED RIVER, ATCHAFALAYA, ETC., LEVEE BD. 278 So. 2d 496 La. 1973
    520 , (1966); , (1946); Lee v. Giaque, 154 La.
  • Armstrong v. Red River, Atchafalaya & Bayou Bouef Levee Board 261 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
  • Hanks v. Gulf States Utilities Co. 210 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    For instance, , (1946), the original opinion of the court, at page 754, states that Civil Code Article 798, pertaining to prescription of the extent of a servitude, cannot be construed so as to conflict with established jurisprudence in the field of mineral law.
  • Columbia Gulf Transmission Co. v. Fontenot 187 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
    (1947) interprets LSA-C.C.
  • Gunby v. Commercial Solvents Corporation 170 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
  • Frey v. Miller 165 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    417 , ], and if the mineral owner can divide the advantages of a servitude by assigning to a third person all of his interest in a designated portion of the land affected by the servitude and create a situation whereby user of a portion would not hold the remainder, as held in Ohio Oil Co. v. Ferguson, supra, [ , 34 So.
  • Gulf Oil Corporation v. Clement 118 So. 2d 361 La. 1960
    742 ; , and Long-Bell Petroleum Co., Inc. v. Tritico, 216 La.
  • Brown v. Mayfield 92 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
    art. 657 , , Byrd v. Forgotson, 213 La.
  • Childs v. Washington 87 So. 2d 111 La. 1956
    While it is true that in the evolution of mineral law in this State, a mineral grant or reservation came to be defined as a servitude, 2 the rights of which, according to the provisions of the Civil Code, are not susceptible of division, 3 and numerous cases may be found containing expressions maintaining the indivisibility of a servitude, 4 , (which ruling was the basis for the decision of this Court on rehearing in the case of Byrd v. Forgotson, 213 La.
  • Jumonville Pipe & MacHinery Co. v. Federal Land Bank 87 So. 2d 721 La. 1956
    Again, , , we held that there was nothing so sacramental in the doctrine of indivisibility of servitudes as to prevent the division of the advantage of a servitude, if it be susceptible of division, by agreement of the interested parties.
  • Starr Davis Oil Co. v. Webber 48 So. 2d 906 La. 1950
    207 ; , and Long-Bell Petroleum Co. v. Tritico, supra.