DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Burns v. Evans Cooperage Co., 23 So. 2d 165.

50 citing documents.

  • Danielle Brooke Thibodeaux v. Ace American Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • Thibodeaux v. Ace American Insurance Co. 127 So. 3d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • Sherman Journet v. Clifford Mouton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • Journet v. Mouton 107 So. 3d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • Tony Lavalais v. Melissa E. Brister La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Lavalais v. Brister 7 So. 3d 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Perkins v. Allstate Indem. Ins. Co. 821 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Duncan v. Safeway Insurance Company of Louisiana, 35,240 (La.App.2d Cir.10/31/01) ; , (1945).
  • Falgout v. Louis-Jeune 799 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • Stiltner v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. 798 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • Kilpatrick v. Alliance Cas. & Reinsurance Co. 663 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • Sibley v. Hayden 423 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    Bums v. Evans Cooperage Co., [ ] (La.App.
  • Chaney v. Cunningham 411 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Bodin v. Dauphine 351 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
  • Rothring v. Travelers Indemnity Co. 338 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
  • Morgan v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Company 317 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
  • Pardue v. Johnson 307 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    “The Louisiana Supreme Court in the case of Burns v. Evans Cooperage Company (1945) , , elaborated upon this rule of law as follows: ‘It is the duty of the driver operating an automobile, upon approaching another automobile, from the rear while both cars are traveling in the same direction, to exercise a great deal of care.
  • Coleman v. Van Dyke 277 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
    (1945); Washington Fire & Myers v. Traders & General Insurance Company, (La.App.
  • Walker v. Milton 268 So. 2d 654 La. 1972
    545 , (1949); , (1945); , (La.App., 2nd Cir. 1966); Malone and Guerry, Studies in Louisiana Torts Law, pp. 306-334 (1970).
  • Walker v. Milton 268 So. 2d 654 La. 1972
    545 , (1949); , (1945); , (La.App., 2nd Cir. 1966); Malone and Guerry, Studies in Louisiana Torts Law, pp. 306-334 (1970).
  • Jenkins v. Travelers Indemnity Co. 245 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    (1945), as follows: “It is the duty of the driver operating an automobile, upon approaching another automobile from the rear while both cars are travelling in the same direction, to exercise a great deal of care.
  • Malone v. Hartford Insurance 239 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
  • Husser v. Bogalusa Coca Cola Bottling Company 215 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    Gorum v. Pritchard, La.App., .
  • Richard v. American Oil Company 213 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
    (1945); certiorari denied.
  • Hayes v. Travelers Indemnity Co. 213 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
  • Jeansonne v. Willie 212 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    A few are: , ; Viator v. Gilbert, La.App., ; Bouis v. Employers Liability Assurance Corporation, La.App., ; McNulty v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Max Barnett Furniture Co. v. Barrosse, La.App., ; Crow v. Alesi, La.App., ; Gandy v. Arrant, La.
  • Volkswagen Insurance v. Tamburello 210 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    1st Cir. 1951): “A motorist following other traffic must keep his automobile at a safe distance behind so as to enable him to stop his automobile in a sudden emergency.” In Taylor we also discussed a , (1945); ; a
  • Merritt v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 199 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
  • Taylor v. Genuine Parts Company 192 So. 2d 241 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
    * * *" , , was decided on facts vastly different from those before us. Therein the court held that the driver of an automobile overtaking another from the rear must exercise a "great deal" of care, must keep a safe distance behind, and must have his automobile under such control as to avoid injury to the automob
  • Wagner v. Travelers Indemnity Co. 185 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
  • Gorum v. Pritchard 173 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
    (1945); August v. Delta Fire & Casualty Co., (1st Cir. 1955); (1st Cir.1959).
  • Evans v. Thorpe 175 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
    (1945); , La.App., 4th Cir. 1964; , La.App., 1st Cir. 1957; Washington Fire & Marine Ins.
  • Emmons v. Bertucci 163 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
  • Broussard v. American Insurance Co. 127 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    904 ; Burns v. Evans Cooperage Company, Inc., , and Savoie v. Dupuy, 218 La.
  • Hoffpauir v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 124 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
    Burns v. Evans Cooperage Company, Inc., et al., 1945, , ; Ballard v. Piehler, La.App.1957, ; Harrell v. Goodwin, La.App.1947, .
  • Hargett v. Chemical Service, Inc. 116 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    904 ; , ; Savoie v. Dupuy, 218 La.
  • Sibley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. 113 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    The District Judge was of the opinion that the plaintiff was guilty of negligence in following too closely and not keeping a proper lookout under the authority of Max Barnett Furniture Co., Inc. v. Barosse, La.App., ; Burns v. Evans Cooperage Co., Inc., , ; Vienne v. Chalona, La.App., ; Roberson v. Rodriguez, La.App., 186 So.
  • Le Jeune v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 105 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    * * * ” , and Le Brun v. *331 American Paper Manufacturing Co., La.
  • Demerest v. Travelers Insurance Company 102 So. 2d 451 La. 1958
    904 ; Burns v. Evans Cooperage, Company, Inc., , and Savoie v. Dupuy, 218 La.
  • Johnson v. Wilson 97 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    at page 169, in denying recovery to an overtaking driver who failed to observe the slowing of the forward vehicle preparatory to its intended left turn: "It is the duty of the driver operating an automobile, upon approaching another automobile from the rear while both cars are travelling in the same d
  • Ballard v. Piehler 98 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    943 , ; , ; Dupuy v. Veazey, La.App., *276 In Brown v. Louisville & N. R. Co., D.C., 135 F.Supp.
  • Litton v. Samuel 98 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
    Burns v. Evans Cooperage Company, Inc., 1945, , ; Dupuy v. Veazey, supra.
  • Washington Fire & Marine Insurance v. Bradford 96 So. 2d 332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    In Burns v. Evans Cooperage Company, Inc., 1945, , , at page 169, the court had under consideration the negligence of plaintiff, who damaged his automobile while trying to avoid collision with a truck when it slowed down preparatory to making a left turn, and appraised the responsibility of the following automobile, saying: “It is the duty of the driver
  • Lofton v. Coleman 91 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    231 ; Burns v. Evans Cooperage Co., Inc., La.App., ; Burns v. Evans Cooperage Co., Inc., , ; Furr v. Ash, La.App., .” Counsel for appellant stress in their brief that the trial judge in reaching the foregoing conclusion failed to take into account defendant’s testimony that he traveled some seventy-five feet down the highway immediately prior to executing his left turn maneuver wi
  • Bagala v. Kimble 74 So. 2d 172 La. 1954
    Burns v. Evans Cooperage Co., Inc., , .
  • Martin v. Bruchhaus 74 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    Burns v. Evans Cooperage Co., La.App., , affirmed , , at page 169, because it was the Court's finding of fact that the driver of defendants' truck was preparing to make a left turn after taking the proper precautions, but that he did not attempt to make the turn when he noted the approach of plaintiff's automobile out of control.
  • Max Barnett Furniture Co. v. Barrosse 70 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    motorist must govern his ‘speed or keep back a reasonably safe distance- so as to provide for the contingency of a car in front'suddenly stopping, and so that-he can stop without a collision, or can turn out sufficiently to pass the vehicle in front without going across the street in-the way of traffic approaching from the opposite direction, * * *.” See, also, Burns v. Evans Cooperage Co., Inc., , ; Vienne v. Chalona, La.App., ; Roberson v. Rodriguez, La.App., 186 So.
  • Laird v. Pan American Cas. Co. 65 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    See: Burns v. Evans Cooperage Co., Inc., 1945, , ; Kihneman v. Nejim, La.App., 1947, ; Dowell, Inc. v. Bayou State Oil Corporation, La.App., 1948, ; Buttitta v. Varino, La.App., 1940, 197 So.
  • Dupuy v. Veazey 63 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    Burns v. Evans Cooperage Co., Inc., 1945, , .
  • Le Brun v. American Paper Mfg. Co. 41 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1949
    These cases are: , ; Kelly v. Neff, La.
  • Distinguished Cassar v. Mansfield Lumber Co. 41 So. 2d 209 La. 1949
    2 In this respect, , , where the Court refused to consider the doctrine of last clear chance because it had not been invoked by pleading, testimony or argument.